2017
DOI: 10.5846/stxb201508101680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of climate change on the potential geographical distribution of broadleaved Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) forests

Abstract: 收稿日期:2015• 08• 10; 网络出版日期:2016• 06• 13 * 通讯作者 Corresponding author.E•mail: lmdai@ iae.ac.cn DOI: 10.5846 / stxb201508101680 贾翔,马芳芳,周旺明,周莉,于大炮, 秦静, 代力民.气候变化对阔叶红松林潜在地理分布区的影响.生态学报,2017,37(2) :464• 473. Jia X, Ma F F, Zhou W M, Zhou L, Yu D P, Qin J, Dai L M.Impacts of climate change on the potential geographical distribution of broadleaved Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) forests.Acta Ecologica Sinica,2017,37(2) :464• 473.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential distribution area of species was strongly correlated with environmental variables including temperature, rainfall, terrain and so on (Jia et al ., 2017; Zhang et al ., 2022). Among environmental variables, climate (temperature and rainfall) is among the most critical factors limiting the potential distribution of species(Zhang et al ., 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The potential distribution area of species was strongly correlated with environmental variables including temperature, rainfall, terrain and so on (Jia et al ., 2017; Zhang et al ., 2022). Among environmental variables, climate (temperature and rainfall) is among the most critical factors limiting the potential distribution of species(Zhang et al ., 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the certain correlation between various environmental factors, if directly applied to the model, there may be overfitting phenomenon thought as error source (Jaryan et al, 2013;Jia et al, 2017). In order to eliminate this negative effects on model building and establish a model that has better performance with fewer variables, these 22 environmental variables were extracted from the corresponding layers associated with 422 documented occurrence points in ArcGIS 10.2 and then cross-correlations analysis (Pearson correlation coeffificient, r) have been performed.…”
Section: Variables Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anomalous changes in temperature and precipitation influence the geographical distribution of species [ 13 , 21 ]. To determine which environmental variables over the period 1970–2000 most strongly influenced the distribution of the PWN, we selected 20 environmental variables, including 19 bioclimatic variables and one altitude variable in our model (Table 2), with a spatial resolution of approximately 1 km 2 , downloaded from global climate data ( http://www.worldclim.org ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decade, some scientists assessed the potential distribution of PWN in Chongqing City or Sichuan Province alone using known distribution records together with layers of environmental variables [ 11 , 14 ], but there is a lack of similar research focusing on Sichuan-Chongqing together. Therefore, these above-mentioned related studies are relatively incomplete, which are mainly reflected in: (1) the relatively small areas studied, because the MaxEnt model can only achieve higher accuracy on a large scale and has a large error on a small scale, which could be because a higher spatial scale means that more species information can be obtained [ 15 , 16 ]; (2) the lack of accurate location analysis of increases and decreases in distribution, resulting in difficulty in laying out the scientific investigations and control pest infestations [ 17 ]; (3) a lack of innovation in research methods, compared with our new method that uses the newly introduced maximum Youden index and the average habitat suitability based on 10 replicates by cross-validation [ 18 , 19 ]; (4) only one specific global climate model (GCM) is used, making it difficult to explain related uncertainties owing to a lack of experimental verification of prediction results from multiple GCMs [ 11 , 14 ]; and (5) a lack of multicollinearity analysis among environmental variables, which is regarded as an error source [ 20 , 21 ]. Moreover, climate change, in terms of temperature and precipitation, will affect the geographical distribution of animals and plants [ 13 ], increase the invasion of alien species, and increase biodiversity losses [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multi-collinearity test (IBM SPSS Statistics 24) was performed on the 22 variables (Appendix 2). Only those variables with higher loading coefficients were included in the model when the absolute Pearson correlation coefficient |r| ≥ 0.8 (Yang et al, 2013;Jia et al, 2017). Finally, nine environmental variables, including six bioclimatic variables (Bio1 (annual mean temperature), Bio3 (isothermality), Bio5 (max temperature of warmest month), Bio7 (temperature annual range), Bio15 (precipitation seasonality) and Bio17 (precipitation of driest quarter)) and three topographic variables (elevation, slope and aspect) were selected for Maxent prediction (Appendix 2).…”
Section: Environmental Variable Selection and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%