Proceedings of SPE/EPA Exploration and Production Environmental Conference 1995
DOI: 10.2523/29707-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Future Resource Development in Louisiana Wetlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Environmental aspects of oil and gas field work in the U.S. are subject to numerous federal statutes such as the National Environmental Policy Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, the Antiquities Act, and the Threatened and Endangered Species Act. These statutes apply to industry activities on all types of land, although an engineering study (B. Harder, C. John, and A. Dupont 1995), a survey of operators, landowners, and federal land managers (Mitch Kunce, Shelby Gerking, William Morgan 2001), and Congressional testimony (James T. Hackett 2001) suggest that enforcement is more stringent on federal land than on private land.…”
Section: Checkerboard Drilling Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental aspects of oil and gas field work in the U.S. are subject to numerous federal statutes such as the National Environmental Policy Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, the Antiquities Act, and the Threatened and Endangered Species Act. These statutes apply to industry activities on all types of land, although an engineering study (B. Harder, C. John, and A. Dupont 1995), a survey of operators, landowners, and federal land managers (Mitch Kunce, Shelby Gerking, William Morgan 2001), and Congressional testimony (James T. Hackett 2001) suggest that enforcement is more stringent on federal land than on private land.…”
Section: Checkerboard Drilling Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Are these resources protected from drilling more vigorously on federal property than on private property? Little information is available on these long-standing questions except for impressionistic evidence from operators, Congressional testimony by industry representatives (Hackett 2001 and Committee on Resources 2001), and a small number of engineering cost studies (Harder, et al 1995 andPenn 1986). Yet, they are directly related to policy issues including how the regulatory structure in the oil and gas industry actually works, what steps the government might take to improve regulatory efficiency, and whether surface resources nearby to drilling sites are over or under-protected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%