2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.06.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of environments on nanoscale wear behavior of graphene: Edge passivation vs. substrate pinning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
51
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
4
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be found that, on the graphene basal plane, the trace and retrace lateral signals almost overlap with each other. This implies that the friction between the AFM tip and the graphene basal plane is very small, which agrees with previous results [37].…”
Section: (A))supporting
confidence: 93%
“…It can be found that, on the graphene basal plane, the trace and retrace lateral signals almost overlap with each other. This implies that the friction between the AFM tip and the graphene basal plane is very small, which agrees with previous results [37].…”
Section: (A))supporting
confidence: 93%
“…edge is found dependent on humidity, as the dangling bonds at the step edge could be passivated by water molecules (Fig. 32(c)) [696]. The grain boundaries (GBs) on graphene are also responsible for the deterioration of wear resistance, as Zhang et al have proposed [697].…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using atomic force microscope (AFM) tip with a radius about 100 nm sliding on graphene that mechanically exfoliated to SiO 2 substrates, Qi et al reported that the monolayer graphene still maintained a low friction coefficient of 0.01 for a prolonged period (4096 cycles) with a normal load up to 9150 nN, and the interior region of graphene shows better wear resistance. Qi et al further found that the wear resistance of the free edge of graphene could be improved by performing air plasma treatment. With a similar setup, Vasic et al showed that the SiO 2 substrate gets plastically deformed for lower normal loads, followed by a sudden tearing of graphene for high enough normal load, with subsequent graphene peeling off from the substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%