2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00374-015-1003-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of eucalypt plantation management on soil faunal communities and nutrient bioavailability: trading function for dependence?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The structural equation model indicated that, in addition to the overall increase in springtail abundance following fertilization (Table 1), the application of superphosphate also had a negative effect on springtail abundance that was mediated by available soil P. Other studies have similarly found that the application of inorganic fertilizers can have negative effects on soil fauna communities (Maraun et al 2001;Bünemann et al 2006;Tabaglio et al 2009;Thiele-Bruhn et al 2012). It is possible that this effect is caused by direct toxicity of the inorganic fertilizer, although available P in soil was still quite low, or due to stress associated with increased soil osmotic pressure caused by the fertilizer application (Jacobs and Timmer 2005;Aslam et al 2015). Alternatively, this may be a spurious correlation associated with the small sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The structural equation model indicated that, in addition to the overall increase in springtail abundance following fertilization (Table 1), the application of superphosphate also had a negative effect on springtail abundance that was mediated by available soil P. Other studies have similarly found that the application of inorganic fertilizers can have negative effects on soil fauna communities (Maraun et al 2001;Bünemann et al 2006;Tabaglio et al 2009;Thiele-Bruhn et al 2012). It is possible that this effect is caused by direct toxicity of the inorganic fertilizer, although available P in soil was still quite low, or due to stress associated with increased soil osmotic pressure caused by the fertilizer application (Jacobs and Timmer 2005;Aslam et al 2015). Alternatively, this may be a spurious correlation associated with the small sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…From the evidence discussed here, the answer to this question goes beyond the similarity in the remote perception of different cover types. We must be able to distinguish the nature of the complex system locally defined by vertical layering, above and belowground linkages, and functional biodiversity, all of which are the product of species identities, biogeochemical process, ecosystem functions, and history of land cover change [79][80][81] . The challenge for plantation managers is to design a production system that can be suitable for preserving both biotic diversity and ecosystem processes.…”
Section: Soil Invertebrate Communities As Indicators Of Ecosystem Status Differences Among Sites Acrossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Madeira, Araujo e Pereira (1995) salientam que o acúmulo de massa na camada de serapilheira e a liberação de nutrientes pela mesma camada, é fortemente aumentada, quando se disponibiliza simultaneamente água e nutrientes. Aslam et al (2015) atribuem esse resultado ao uso da irrigação, visto que esta tecnologia proporcionou aumento da disponibilidade de nutrientes para as plantas adubadas, ou seja, insumos artificiais podem substituir o papel de biota do solo e aliado à irrigação promovem melhores resultados.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified