2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-005-0085-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of flight distance on sex ratio and resource allocation to offspring in the leafcutter bee, Megachile rotundata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of a 100 m radius is somewhat arbitrary, and very likely underestimates resources available to newly emerged insects: typical natal dispersal distances are unknown, but Osmia-sized solitary bees can fly distances of several hundred meters (Gathmann andTscharntke 2002, Greenleaf et al 2007). However, preferred foraging ranges are certainly less than this in several species (see, e.g., Peterson and Roitberg 2006, Greenleaf et al 2007, Zurbuchen et al 2010. In any case, as the purpose of the transects was to estimate phenological progression of the flowering plant community rather than to quantify resource availability, a 100 m radius provides a reasonable index.…”
Section: Field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of a 100 m radius is somewhat arbitrary, and very likely underestimates resources available to newly emerged insects: typical natal dispersal distances are unknown, but Osmia-sized solitary bees can fly distances of several hundred meters (Gathmann andTscharntke 2002, Greenleaf et al 2007). However, preferred foraging ranges are certainly less than this in several species (see, e.g., Peterson and Roitberg 2006, Greenleaf et al 2007, Zurbuchen et al 2010. In any case, as the purpose of the transects was to estimate phenological progression of the flowering plant community rather than to quantify resource availability, a 100 m radius provides a reasonable index.…”
Section: Field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This location provides a high diversity and stable richness of food plants. Effects of resource shortage or extensive traveling costs on maternal investment can be excluded (Kim 1999;Ulbrich and Seidelmann 2001;Ivanov 2006;Peterson and Roitberg 2006). Beside the test block, additional nesting tubes of Japanese knotweed (various dimensions) and wooden nest blocks (tube dimensions 8×150 mm, 100-120 tubes per block) were offered in one and the same shelter that protected the nest material from rain and direct sunshine.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conclusions drawn from studies in Þeld enclosures have shown how resource limitation leads to a reduction in reproductive success (Kim 1999, Peterson and Roitberg 2006a, Pitts-Singer and Bosch 2010), but such results may not be applicable to real-life situations. In enclosures, bees cannot escape to areas where more or alternative resources are available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%