2022
DOI: 10.1080/00288233.2022.2077380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of growing and utilising genetically modified crops and forages – a New Zealand perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a potentially intractable challenge in delivering this technology will be gaining regulatory approval for its release from containment for general use in grazed pastures. While it has been argued (Lee & Giesbrecht, 2021;Roberts, 2018) that genetically modified plants are no less safe than those bred traditionally and are delivering increased efficiencies and benefits, there is still a reluctance to accept these modern breeding techniques as legitimate and of value (Caradus, 2022). Regulatory systems are outdated, technocratic and expensive, and rather than regulating the process the focus should be on regulating the benefit -risk issues associated with the end-product ) were used as biological replicates Czemmel et al, 2012;Gu et al, 2004;Naing & Kim, 2018) and as such, are considered beneficial in delivering health-promoting properties of plants used in human diets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a potentially intractable challenge in delivering this technology will be gaining regulatory approval for its release from containment for general use in grazed pastures. While it has been argued (Lee & Giesbrecht, 2021;Roberts, 2018) that genetically modified plants are no less safe than those bred traditionally and are delivering increased efficiencies and benefits, there is still a reluctance to accept these modern breeding techniques as legitimate and of value (Caradus, 2022). Regulatory systems are outdated, technocratic and expensive, and rather than regulating the process the focus should be on regulating the benefit -risk issues associated with the end-product ) were used as biological replicates Czemmel et al, 2012;Gu et al, 2004;Naing & Kim, 2018) and as such, are considered beneficial in delivering health-promoting properties of plants used in human diets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 286 Similarly, in New Zealand, under the jurisdiction of Food Standards Australia and New Zealand importation is permitted for at least 90 GM produced foods which can then be sold and consumed if labelled while farmers are not permitted to grow GM crops and forages including those produced using New Breeding Technologies. 3 The debate on the place of new technologies, including gene editing, in food production systems is underway 287 but will still require engagement by industry and government leaders.…”
Section: Differentiating Between Different Types Of Genetic Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some countries have begun re-evaluating their legislation and as a result, developed a position on how to manage and regulate (or not) products from New Breeding Technologies others are yet to do this. Some countries have food safety standards which allow importation and use of GM food, so long as it is labelled, but other regulations do not permit their farmers to grow and produce GM crops, as currently occurs in New Zealand 3 , 4 ; and Ecuador. 5 Additionally, there are situations where GM crops can be imported for animal feed, but again, other regulations do not permit their farmers to grow and produce GM crops, as occurs in Europe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consumer concerns about using GM crops and forages in New Zealand has been reviewed (Caradus 2022b). It concludes that "while there will always be a proportion of consumers against the use of GM in food production, the published evidence would suggest that the use of GM plants in New Zealand for food production will have no long-term deleterious effects in overseas markets".…”
Section: Consumer Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%