Risk factors affecting fathering have generally been considered independently. In daily life, however, risk factors are likely to co-occur. Guided by multidimensional family development theory, we applied a latent profile analysis to examine the joint contribution of multiple risk factors—psychological distress, destructive conflict, and social support—on fathers’ parenting behaviors: nurturance, harsh discipline, and engagement. The data (N = 1,770) were drawn from a federally funded responsible fatherhood initiative that was coordinated by Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. across the United States. The present study accessed data collected in a single Western state. Participants were mostly White fathers but diverse in terms of education, income, and age. Variables were assessed through fathers’ self-reported data. The results revealed three profiles of fathers: fully aligned (57.4%) included fathers who experienced the lowest levels of destructive conflict and psychological distress and highest levels of social support, partially aligned (34.5%) consisted of fathers who scored moderately on each factor, and misaligned (8.1%) included fathers who reported the highest levels of destructive conflict and psychological distress and the lowest levels of social support. When fathers struggled in one domain, they were likely to experience difficulties in other domains, and these challenges compromised their parenting. Fathers who faced multiple risk factors were less likely to be engaged and provide nurturing parenting. Residential and married fathers were more likely to use harsh discipline. The results suggest that interventions should address multiple needs, target all fathers (not just those at high risk), and help residential married fathers enact alternatives to harsh discipline.