2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of human and spatial factors on user satisfaction in office environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
67
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In indoor environmental quality field studies dealing with thermal, acoustic, and illuminous conditions and indoor air quality at a same time, various types of scales have been used for subjective assessment. Interval scales of 4-7 points [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] have been frequently used for combined environmental assessments. Dichotomous scales [21,22,[36][37][38], 11-point scales [39], 13-point scales [39], and VASs [20,36] were also used for indoor environmental assessments.…”
Section: Literature Review On Response Scales In Indoor Environmentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In indoor environmental quality field studies dealing with thermal, acoustic, and illuminous conditions and indoor air quality at a same time, various types of scales have been used for subjective assessment. Interval scales of 4-7 points [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] have been frequently used for combined environmental assessments. Dichotomous scales [21,22,[36][37][38], 11-point scales [39], 13-point scales [39], and VASs [20,36] were also used for indoor environmental assessments.…”
Section: Literature Review On Response Scales In Indoor Environmentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In today's buildings, the importance of indoor environmental quality (IEQ) has been increasing, especially the factors of thermal and visual quality, due to its significant impacts on occupants' productivity, health, and quality of life [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. This indoor environmental significance has motivated numerous design and technology advancements, especially as applied to modern building environmental controls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the office, there is no significant difference amongst age groups regarding visual satisfaction [10]; The satisfaction with lighting of those workers occupying stations closer to the windows was significantly higher than those located in the core areas; However, gender elicited a difference in the evaluation of satisfaction with lighting only in the core areas and men's ratings were higher than the women's [11]; Significant gender differences were observed for mean satisfaction level with each indoor environmental quality factor based on data from office buildings [12]; User satisfaction revealed significant differences in illuminance level in different workstation locations in modern offices located in Southern California [13]. In Hong Kong housing units, no significant difference was found between males and females, however, distinct differences were found amongst age groups in satisfaction evaluation, and the elders' ratings were the highest [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%