2017
DOI: 10.1002/2017gh000103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of Intensive Livestock Production on Human Health in Densely Populated Regions

Abstract: In several regions worldwide, the presence of livestock in close proximity to residential areas raises questions about public health implications. The rapid expansion of large‐scale livestock farms, increasingly interwoven with urbanized areas, and its potential impact on neighboring residents' health has hardly been accompanied by any research. The current situation in densely populated livestock farming areas could be regarded as a “natural experiment.” Most scientific and public health initiatives have focu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
67
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(43 reference statements)
1
67
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well-documented that agriculture constitutes a major source of air pollution [1][2][3][4]. Livestock farms emit high levels of environmental agents and pathogens that could elicit adverse health effects, such as bacteria, viruses, endotoxins, and particular matter [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is well-documented that agriculture constitutes a major source of air pollution [1][2][3][4]. Livestock farms emit high levels of environmental agents and pathogens that could elicit adverse health effects, such as bacteria, viruses, endotoxins, and particular matter [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of information regarding exposure type and levels in the proximity of livestock farms [5], several epidemiological studies have investigated health effects in residents living in the neighborhood of livestock farms, such as respiratory complaints, pneumonia, asthma, allergies, and lung function deficit [7][8][9][10][11][12]. In the Netherlands in particular, the magnitude of the risk for adverse effects can be large, considering the high animal density alongside with the high human population density [4]. A representative example is the Q-fever outbreak caused by the bacterial pathogen Coxiella burnetii, affecting more than 4000 people in the period 2007-2010 [13], with dairy goats and dairy sheep being the main source of the pathogen.Following that incident, the potential health risks of living in the vicinity of large livestock farms has been receiving increased attention, due to a number of findings regarding the increased rates of primarily respiratory symptoms and infections in the eastern part of the province of North Brabant and the northern part of the province of Limburg.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smaller particles (e.g., PM 2.5 ) have a longer atmospheric lifetime than larger particles, which tend to settle more quickly (Cambra‐López et al, ; Melse et al, ). Therefore, smaller particles can contribute to air pollution on a regional scale, while larger particles tend to contribute to air pollution on a local scale (Cambra‐López et al, ; Smit & Heederik, ).…”
Section: Environmental Health Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cattle can excrete a number of different zoonotic pathogens that can aerosolize and infect humans through inhalation (Cambra‐López et al, ; McDaniel et al, ; Smit & Heederik, ). For example, Coxiella burnetii , which is the causative agent of Q fever in humans, is shed in high numbers in the birth products of infected cattle (McDaniel et al, ; Porter et al, ).…”
Section: Environmental Health Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation