2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-017-1372-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of invasive biota in forest ecosystems in an aboveground–belowground context

Abstract: Forest ecosystems world-wide are being subjected to invasion by organisms representing all domains of life. Here we use a combined aboveground-belowground approach to provide a conceptual framework for assessing how forests respond to biological invasions. We first address mechanisms by which invasive plants and aboveground and belowground consumers impact on forests, and highlight that although we have a growing understanding of the determinants of the effects of invasive plants, for invasive consumers we hav… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
0
65
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We define legacies as effects of non‐native species that remain after the species has been removed through changes in soil biological, chemical or physical conditions and subsequent plant communities (Corbin & D'Antonio, ). Legacies can be difficult to reverse and can make restoration of an ecosystem difficult or unattainable (Wardle & Peltzer, ). The context‐dependent nature of legacy effects is often related to non‐native species density and net per capita effect at the time of removal (Figure ).…”
Section: Context Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We define legacies as effects of non‐native species that remain after the species has been removed through changes in soil biological, chemical or physical conditions and subsequent plant communities (Corbin & D'Antonio, ). Legacies can be difficult to reverse and can make restoration of an ecosystem difficult or unattainable (Wardle & Peltzer, ). The context‐dependent nature of legacy effects is often related to non‐native species density and net per capita effect at the time of removal (Figure ).…”
Section: Context Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such secondary invasions are widespread (Corbin & D'Antonio, ), and some evidence suggests that removal of non‐native pines can facilitate secondary invasion by grasses or other woody non‐native species (Dickie et al, ). Knowledge of management legacies is thus an important aspect of the context dependence of non‐native species impacts and is critical for informing decisions on both management effectiveness in mitigating invasion impacts, and on whether additional activities such as active restoration following removal of the non‐native species are needed (Wardle & Peltzer, ).…”
Section: Context Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2; Wardle et al, 2015) and may cause changes to the soil that further accelerates its invasion through a positive feedback process. Plant-soil feedbacks are well recognised as processes that accompany invasions by non-native trees (Ehrenfeld, 2010;Vitousek and Walker, 1989;Wardle and Peltzer, 2017). Conservation policy in Jamaica aims to prevent deforestation and to maintain the forest cover in protected areas, including the Blue and John Crow Mountains National Park (Chai et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, plant litter of exotic plant species has been shown to decompose more readily than that of surrounding natives because it contains higher nutrient concentrations, and thus has overall higher quality Vitousek 2004, Ashton et al 2005). Exotics plant species may, therefore, increase soil nutrient availability through their litter inputs to the soil (Wardle and Peltzer 2017), which can create a positive feedback to their own growth. In general, high nutrient availability in the soil, both via pre-existing soil condition or via litter effects, may become even more important when exotic plant species are released from their specialized enemies as shown by Blumenthal et al (2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%