2020
DOI: 10.21608/jmr.2020.44778.1053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of Magnetic Field Treatment on Water Quality for Irrigation, Soil Properties and Maize Yield.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Magnetic irrigation water under 75 or 100% NPK of recommended levels gave the best results for tomato growth and yield reducing the applied rate of N and K fertilizers (Helaly, 2018). Also, magnetic treatment increased water that is readily available and enhanced the solubility and uptake of nitrogen, phosphate, and potassium, which raised maize crop production (Hamza et al, 2021).…”
Section: Head Quality Of Early Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Magnetic irrigation water under 75 or 100% NPK of recommended levels gave the best results for tomato growth and yield reducing the applied rate of N and K fertilizers (Helaly, 2018). Also, magnetic treatment increased water that is readily available and enhanced the solubility and uptake of nitrogen, phosphate, and potassium, which raised maize crop production (Hamza et al, 2021).…”
Section: Head Quality Of Early Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This modification impacted plant development, furthermore, the concentration of soluble ions like Ca +2 , Mg +2 , Cland SO4 -2 were reduced (Kareem et al, 2019). Irrigation with magnetized water had a high-water efficiency and a higher moisture content, water availability, and soil field capacity in sandy soil (Hamza et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(18) Results Hamza et al, 2021 indicated that water treatment with magnetic field reduces the angle of water contact and increases the ability of water to enter the micro-pores of the soil, and thus provides a higher capacity of the soil to retain water compared to the soil irrigated with non-magnetized water. (19) A decrease has also been observed in the value of carbonate ions (Co3) in the soil when the irrigation water is magnetized, because in non-magnetic water carbonates are deposited in the pores of the soil and on the plant roots, but using magnetic water the carbonate salts do not precipitate and the salts deposited on the inner surface of the irrigation pipes can be broken down, and thus the movement of the water will be easier than in non-magnetic water. (12) While it was observed that, the value of PH decreased at a magnetization intensity of 1000 gauss because it releases greater of organic acids in rhizosphere this is consistent with.…”
Section: Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irrigation using MFA was also capable of reducing the soil salinity (e.g., EC and SAR) and soluble cations and anions that exist in the soil root zone. Moreover, moisture content, soil field capacity, and available water increased in sandy soil after MFA application [49]. It was mentioned that the efficiency of MFA differed based on the type of irrigation and plants.…”
Section: Treatment Of Marginal Water Using a Magnetic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%