1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-8486-1_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of Marine Debris: Entanglement of Marine Life in Marine Debris Including a Comprehensive List of Species with Entanglement and Ingestion Records

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

5
391
1
26

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 500 publications
(423 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
391
1
26
Order By: Relevance
“…Research on the impacts of plastics on marine biota has mainly focused on large plastic items which may have direct negative impacts on over 260 species, generally through ingestion and entanglement 4,8 . However, there is increasing concern about the impacts of smaller plastics on marine organisms about which much less is known 4,9,10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on the impacts of plastics on marine biota has mainly focused on large plastic items which may have direct negative impacts on over 260 species, generally through ingestion and entanglement 4,8 . However, there is increasing concern about the impacts of smaller plastics on marine organisms about which much less is known 4,9,10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twelve of 32 seal species have been recorded to ingest plastic at least occasionally (Kühn et al, 2015), but seals generally are more often entangled in debris than affected by ingestion (Laist, 1997;but see Bravo Rebolledo et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is probable that a wide range of marine organisms are affected by plastic wastes in the sea. Macrodebris ingestion and entanglement are well documented in sea birds, mammals and turtles and more recently in fishes and invertebrates (e.g., Laist, 1987Laist, , 1997Gramentz, 1988;Weisskopf, 1988;Slip et al, 1990;Moser and Lee, 1992;Shaw and Day, 1994;Goldberg, 1997;Robards et al, 1995;Derraik, 2002;Thompson et al, 2004;Ryan et al, 2009;Boerger et al, 2010;Murray and Cowie, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%