2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.geodrs.2020.e00337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of national scale digital soil mapping programs in France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used 625 topsoil samples collected from 2005 to 2018 that are part of a set that includes three databases used for digital soil mapping (DSM) in France (Figure 1). The first set corresponds to the French soil profile database (DoneSol) (to see more details, visit http://www.gissol.fr/ (accessed on 12 December 2021)), in which soil information (soil profiles and augering sampling and analyses) mainly came from data gathered for conventional soil mapping using points that were spread irregularly across the French mainland territory [33]. The second set was collected in May 2018 by the Center for Spatial Studies of the Biosphere in Toulouse (CESBIO) in conjunction with the functional ecology and ecotoxicology of agroecosystems unit (ECOSYS), and the third data set used in this study is the 2015 Land Use and Land Cover Survey (LUCAS) from the European Union Statistical Office (EUROSTAT) [34].…”
Section: Soil Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used 625 topsoil samples collected from 2005 to 2018 that are part of a set that includes three databases used for digital soil mapping (DSM) in France (Figure 1). The first set corresponds to the French soil profile database (DoneSol) (to see more details, visit http://www.gissol.fr/ (accessed on 12 December 2021)), in which soil information (soil profiles and augering sampling and analyses) mainly came from data gathered for conventional soil mapping using points that were spread irregularly across the French mainland territory [33]. The second set was collected in May 2018 by the Center for Spatial Studies of the Biosphere in Toulouse (CESBIO) in conjunction with the functional ecology and ecotoxicology of agroecosystems unit (ECOSYS), and the third data set used in this study is the 2015 Land Use and Land Cover Survey (LUCAS) from the European Union Statistical Office (EUROSTAT) [34].…”
Section: Soil Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, the DSM in Russia is developing [3,[14][15][16][17], but not very intensively compared to foreign countries [6,11,18,19]. However, all results/studies concur about the advantage of using GIS technologies for large and medium-scale DSM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A soil monitoring system could be a source of comparable and objective data on the current state and evolution of soils. The database of the soil monitoring system allows the creation and maintenance of data for each of the monitoring sites of agricultural land as well as the preparation of data for further processing through specialized programs [36]. Position information provides a link to the GIS, and thus opens the possibilities for further spatial analysis, the identification of risk areas and their assessment.…”
Section: Data Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%