2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of nutritional technology on feeds offered to horses: A review of effects of processing on voluntary intake, digesta characteristics and feed utilisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
9
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, fiber presents certain physicochemical properties, such as its solubility, particle size, hydration capacity and viscosity (Potty, 1996), and smaller-sized particles increase the water retention capacity (Hill, 2007). One hypothesis for explaining the increased transit time of the solute phase is that some physical properties of fiber can be altered by mechanical processes, and we suggest that the great reduction of particle size helped to increase the association of small particles with the solute phase, which would increase the viscosity of the digesta and affect its transit time.…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, fiber presents certain physicochemical properties, such as its solubility, particle size, hydration capacity and viscosity (Potty, 1996), and smaller-sized particles increase the water retention capacity (Hill, 2007). One hypothesis for explaining the increased transit time of the solute phase is that some physical properties of fiber can be altered by mechanical processes, and we suggest that the great reduction of particle size helped to increase the association of small particles with the solute phase, which would increase the viscosity of the digesta and affect its transit time.…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agrotec., Lavras, v.38, n.5, p.506-514, set./out., 2014 to be confirmed using commercial standard ground diets, as little information on the supply of physically modified feedstuffs is available in the literature. Hill (2007) described the effects of feedstuff processing in horse diets and suggested that the increased interest on the subject was due to the large number of horses that are kept stalled, which are fed dry forage and concentrate exclusively during most of the year. The author concluded that further studies are necessary to understand the effects of industrial processing on physical and chemical modification in the digestive tract of horses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Hill (2007), palatability can be defined as the sensory perception of the feed, which can be influenced by smell, nutrients, or textures. Thus, it is noteworthy that, throughout the experiment, the peach palm meal underwent the oxidation process, which was visible by the change in color.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pattern of feed supply is not as expected by the horse's phylogenetic adaptation to grassland environments (Janis, 1976). These management procedures have important implications on the utilization of nutrients from both concentrate and forage components of the total ration, on the digestive tract in general and the hindgut in particular and, of course, on the health and welfare of the horse (Hill, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This pattern of feed supply is not as expected by the horse's phylogenetic adaptation to grassland environments (Janis, 1976). These management procedures have important implications on the utilization of nutrients from both concentrate and forage components of the total ration, on the digestive tract in general and the hindgut in particular and, of course, on the health and welfare of the horse (Hill, 2007).The process of understanding and describing forage degradation mechanisms in the equine digestive ecosystem in general, and in the hindgut in particular, is essential to provide information for proper feeding practices to be implemented. Despite the anatomical and placement differences between the rumen and the hindgut of horses, comparison between these digestive compartments is routinely discussed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%