2018
DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2018.1526721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of prescribed fires and benefits from their reduction for air quality, health, and visibility in the Pacific Northwest of the United States

Abstract: Using a WRF-SMOKE-CMAQ modeling framework, we investigate the impacts of smoke from prescribed fires on model performance, regional and loc al air quality, health impacts, and visibility in protected natural environments using three different prescribed fire emission scenarios: 100% fire, no fire, and 30% fire. The 30% fire case reflects a 70% reduction in fire activities due to harvesting of logging residues for use as a feedstock for a potential aviation biofuel supply chain. Overall model performance improv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the chief effects of bushfires is that of smoke inhalation (Johnston et al, 2002;Yu et al, 2020). The same concerns relate to prescribed burning (Ravi et al, 2019). The present study has not included the smaller bushfires, some of which like the Black Friday 2009 event caused losses estimated at 11.8 bn AU$ (Ladds et al, 2017).…”
Section: Cost Benefit Analysis For Big Bushfiresmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…One of the chief effects of bushfires is that of smoke inhalation (Johnston et al, 2002;Yu et al, 2020). The same concerns relate to prescribed burning (Ravi et al, 2019). The present study has not included the smaller bushfires, some of which like the Black Friday 2009 event caused losses estimated at 11.8 bn AU$ (Ladds et al, 2017).…”
Section: Cost Benefit Analysis For Big Bushfiresmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, in 2020, AIRPACT was updated with the Fire Information System with BlueSky Pipeline. The evolution of the operational AIRPACT forecast methodology is documented in the following papers (Vaughan et al, 2004;Chen et al, 2008;Herron-Thorpe et al, 2014;Ravi et al, 2018Ravi et al, , 2019 and at http://www.lar.wsu.edu/airpact.…”
Section: Airpact Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gridded outputs from photochemical models such as WRF-Chem have been used in a number of studies for estimating the burden of disease from air pollution at various scales (regional, national, or global) as well as from various sectors (e.g., transportation, electric generation, wildland fires) Ford et al, 2018;Ravi et al, 2018Ravi et al, , 2019Anenberg et al, 2019). For the change in pollutant exposure (∆C) required by the health impact function, we calculate the gridded differences in concentration of O3 and PM2.5 from different combination of LA100 scenarios to gain insight into the effects of isolating power sector emissions and load levels.…”
Section: Predicted Changes In Air Quality (∆C)mentioning
confidence: 99%