Background: Two commonly used forms of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) were recently shown to be equivalent for the treatment of treatment-resistant depression (TRD): high-frequency stimulation (10 Hz), a protocol that lasts between 19-38 minutes, and intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS), a protocol that can be delivered in just 3 minutes. Intermittent TBS offers significant advantages to patients and clinics and has thus become a default treatment in many clinics. However, it is unclear whether iTBS treatment offers the same benefits as standard 10 Hz rTMS for comorbid symptoms, such as post-traumatic-stress-disorder (PTSD).
Methods: In this retrospective case series, we analyzed treatment outcomes in Veterans from the VA San Diego Healthcare system (VASDHS) who received 10 Hz (n = 47) or iTBS (n = 51) rTMS treatments for TRD between the dates of Jan 2017 to June 2022. We compared outcomes between these two stimulation protocols used between these dates on symptoms of depression (using changes in the patient health questionnaire-9, or PHQ-9) and PTSD (using changes in the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, or PCL-5). We hypothesized that there would be no differences in treatment outcomes between 10 Hz and iTBS protocols for either depression (confirming prior RCT) or PTSD.
Results: We found that both types of stimulation showed a clinically meaningful reduction in symptoms with no difference in outcomes based on the type of stimulation. The mean reduction on the PHQ-9 scale was 5.8 +/- 0.93 (p <0.001, n = 47) in Veterans receiving 10 Hz stimulation and 6.6 +/- 0.71 (p < 0.001, n = 51) in the Veterans receiving iTBS. There were no difference between stimulation protocols (p = 0.5). The mean reduction on the PCL-5 symptom scale was 8.1 +/- 2.1 in Veterans receiving 10 Hz stimulation (p <0.001, n =47) and -13.2 +/- 2.4 the Veterans receiving iTBS (p <0.001, n = 51). This difference was not significant (p=0.11) and had a small effect size (eta^2 = 0.026). Follow-up analyses restricting the sample in various ways did not meaningfully change these results.
Conclusions: While limited by small sample size, non-blinded and pseudo-randomized assignment, our data suggests that iTBS can be expected to have similar if not slightly greater reductions in PTSD symptoms compared with 10 Hz stimulation. Our findings pave the way for further research trials to validate and optimize iTBS for PTSD symptoms.