2017 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT-Europe) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/isgteurope.2017.8260204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of tap stagger on currents of power transformers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the taps are changed, one ATR takes more load, and the other ATR takes less load. This implies that the unbalance in OLTC positions must be limited and, consequently, a lower reactive power can be ab-sorbed compared with the maximum reactive power absorbed in the no-load mode [12]. Also, in the under-load mode, the currents circulating in the two machines must be continuously controlled.…”
Section: Tap Staggering With Normally Loaded Atrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the taps are changed, one ATR takes more load, and the other ATR takes less load. This implies that the unbalance in OLTC positions must be limited and, consequently, a lower reactive power can be ab-sorbed compared with the maximum reactive power absorbed in the no-load mode [12]. Also, in the under-load mode, the currents circulating in the two machines must be continuously controlled.…”
Section: Tap Staggering With Normally Loaded Atrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, TS can also be performed by exploiting the normal layout of the primary substations (owned by the distribution system operators, DSO), which include two HV/MV TRSs in parallel [7,11,12]. However, in this case, the benefits mainly concern the upstream TSO HV network, whereas TS is performed by DSO machines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%