Impacts of the Fossil Fuel Divestment Movement: Effects on Finance, Policy and Public Discourse

Abstract

The fossil fuel divestment movement campaigns for removing investments from fossil fuel companies as a strategy to combat climate change. It is a bottom-up movement, largely based in university student groups, although it has rapidly spread to other institutions. Divestment has been criticised for its naiveté and hard-line stance and dismissed as having little impact on fossil fuel finance. I analyse the impact of divestment through reviewing academic and grey literature, complemented by interviews with activists and financial actors, using a theoretical framework that draws on social movement theory. While the direct impacts of divestment are small, the indirect impacts, in terms of public discourse shift, are significant. Divestment has put questions of finance and climate change on the agenda and played a part in changing discourse around the legitimacy, reputation and viability of the fossil fuel industry. This cultural impact contributed to changes in the finance industry through new demands by shareholders and investors and to changes in political discourse, such as rethinking the notion of ‘fiduciary duty.’ Finally, divestment had significant impact on its participants in terms of empowerment and played a part in the revitalisation of the environmental movement in the UK and elsewhere.

Same Same but Different: How and Why Banks Approach Sustainability

“…The findings also implied that a change in strategy is realized when sustainable practices satisfy not only environmental and social motives but also business rationales. This phenomenon reflects, for example, that growing demand for sustainable investments on the part of customers [112] or growing pressure to impose social and environmental criteria on lending decisions (e.g., as advocated by the fossil fuel divestment movement) [113] indicate the underlying business motives of banks. Reducing risks and meeting customer expectations then function as mediators of practices that have thus far been predominantly socially or environmentally motivated.…”

Making Resource Democracy Radically Meaningful for Stakeowners: Our World, Our Rules?

“…This is because new information technologies in their unprecedented use are giving voice to the voiceless and connecting formerly dispersed and fragmented groups, disciplines, and intellectual and political resources. 'Degrowth', 'deglobalization', 'globalisolationism' [69], 'political ecology', 'radical geography', 'circular economy', 'environmentalism' 'green politics' 'divestment movements' [70] and the increase in socially responsible investment funds. Theseconstitute the conglomerate of concepts and movements that are putting society/environment at the centre of attention.…”

Relating Financial Systems to Sustainability Transitions: Challenges, Demands and Dimensions

“…Global initiatives calling the financial system to act on the sustainability and climate breakdown include a diverse range of convened and lobbying processes 5 . shows trillion-dollar divestment by investors in fossil-fuel companies (Bergman, 2018), which is starting to devalue the investment ratings of the coal-sector (McKibben, 2018). Investment flows reflect support for new industries emerging from sustainability challenges, for example, with renewable energy investment in 2017 reaching U$333.5 billion (Louw, 2018) At the same time, the rapid emergence of practice-based research highlights the need for independent validation of the claims and proposals (Hafner et al, 2019).…”