2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.02.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of variable thermal conductivity on stagnation point boundary layer flow past a Riga plate with variable thickness using generalized Fourier’s law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To inspect the impact of various physical parameters on the dimensionless velocity, temperature and concentration profiles, the numerical results in graphical form are illustrated in Figs. 4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20 Figure 4 illustrates that the velocity profile is a decreasing function of the Maxwell parameter, i.e., the increasing values of the Maxwell parameter reduce the velocity and hence the boundary layer thickness, which is also conventionally true while the convection parameter is present. Physically, k [ 0 means the cooling of the surface or heating of the fluid, k\0 the heating of the surface or cooling of the fluid whereas k ¼ 0 is for no The higher values of the Maxwell parameter enhance the temperature because the thermal boundary layer thickening takes place due to rise in the elasticity stress parameter but away from the boundary, the temperature profile approaches zero.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To inspect the impact of various physical parameters on the dimensionless velocity, temperature and concentration profiles, the numerical results in graphical form are illustrated in Figs. 4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20 Figure 4 illustrates that the velocity profile is a decreasing function of the Maxwell parameter, i.e., the increasing values of the Maxwell parameter reduce the velocity and hence the boundary layer thickness, which is also conventionally true while the convection parameter is present. Physically, k [ 0 means the cooling of the surface or heating of the fluid, k\0 the heating of the surface or cooling of the fluid whereas k ¼ 0 is for no The higher values of the Maxwell parameter enhance the temperature because the thermal boundary layer thickening takes place due to rise in the elasticity stress parameter but away from the boundary, the temperature profile approaches zero.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Franchi and Straughan [8] and Puri and Kythe [9] witnessed that the energy equation due to Cattaneo-Christov model is of hyperbolic type. This model has been used by many researchers considering its multiple applications in heat transfer mechanism [10][11][12][13][14][15] to construct the energy equation and discuss the flow and heat transfer behavior of various non-Newtonian fluids. Awais et al [16] examined the hydro-magnetic flow over a surface of variable thickness under the impacts of Cattaneo-Christov model and the internal heat generation/absorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this purpose, the Fourier's law has been abandoned for the more practicable Cattaneo‐Christov heat flux model (CCHFM). Many recent researchers have opted for this model to examine the heat transfer mechanism 6‐13 . The last decade has seen a number of research articles related to the problems of the visco‐elastic fluids over stretching surfaces using CCHFM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forinstance, Ashraf and Ashraf [9] calculated stagnation point flow of a micropolar fluid on a heated surface in the presence of magnetic field. Shah et al [10] examined the variable thermal conductivity impact on stagnation point boundary layer flow over a Riga plate with www.josa.ro Physics Section variable thickness via generalized Fourier's law. Mustafa et al [11] presented the analytic solution of stagnation point flow of a nanofluid towards a stretching sheet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%