1999
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.22.6.883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impaired glucose tolerance. Why is it not a disease?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, IGT is not recognized as a disease in itself but rather as a risk for future development of diabetes [38,39], despite that IGT can also be a marker of CVD risk [40,41]. Type II diabetes and IGT are associated with an increased CVD risk [1±6, 42±45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, IGT is not recognized as a disease in itself but rather as a risk for future development of diabetes [38,39], despite that IGT can also be a marker of CVD risk [40,41]. Type II diabetes and IGT are associated with an increased CVD risk [1±6, 42±45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment based on impaired fasting glucose has been criticized for including individuals with normal glucose tolerance and a significant minority with diabetes. 35 However, studies have shown that high proportions of individuals with impaired fasting glucose progress to diabetes. 7,8 Information on physical activity and dietary patterns were not available for our study, which may have confounded the results.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was originally conceived to be an analogous condition to impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (4). However, multiple reports have proved that there is a lack of agreement between IGT and IFG (5)(6)(7)(8). The prevalence of IGT was two times higher, and 40% of the IGT cases were considered normal using the fasting glycemia criterion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%