We have read with great interest the increasing number of publications reporting that oral contraceptive (OC) 1 formulations can decrease CYP2C19 activity. For example, Palovaara et al. (2003) evaluated the effect of two OC formulations on the hydroxylation of omeprazole. One formulation contained EE (40 g) and LNG (60 g), whereas the second contained LNG (60 g) and was devoid of EE. The combination of EE and LNG increased both the area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve of omeprazole (38%) and the omeprazole to 5-hydroxy omeprazole area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve ratio (48%). LNG alone had no affect on the PK and metabolism of omeprazole. In addition, neither formulation inhibited CYP3A4-catalyzed omeprazole sulfone formation. Because the hydroxylation of omeprazole is widely accepted as an index of CYP2C19 activity (Chang et al., 1995;Lasker et al., 1998;Abelo et al., 2000;Kita et al., 2001), the authors concluded that OC preparations containing EE decrease CYP2C19 activity. The observations of Palovaara et al. (2003) confirm the findings of Laine et al. (2000), who also reported an increase (ϳ100%) in the omeprazole to 5-hydroxy omeprazole ratio in plasma. In the same study, the ratio of (S)-mephenytoin to (R)-mephenytoin in urine (S/R ratio) increased from 0.11 to 0.28, and the effect was similar to that observed with subjects genotyped CYP2C19*1/*2 (versus CYP2C19*1/*1). A comparable change in the S/R ratio has been reported by Hagg et al. (2001) and Tamminga et al. (1999).EE-containing OC formulations have also been shown to affect the PK and metabolism of diazepam, propranolol, proguanil, and selegiline (Abernethy et al., 1982;Walle et al., 1996;Laine et al., 1999;McGready et al., 2003). All four drugs are reported to be CYP2C19 substrates. However, the effect of EE on their PK cannot be ascribed to CYP2C19 alone, because other cytochromes P450 are involved in metabolism (Jung et al., 1997;Yang et al., 1999;McGinnity et al., 2000;Hidestrand et al., 2001). The same cannot be said for the urinary mephenytoin S/R ratio and the omeprazole to 5-hydroxy omeprazole ratio in plasma. Both have served as a useful index of CYP2C19 activity and have been validated with genotyped subjects (Rodrigues and Rushmore, 2002).Although the results of these various clinical drug interaction studies are compelling, it cannot be assumed that EE is a clinically relevant inhibitor of CYP2C19. The dose of EE is low (30 -50 g), and peak plasma concentrations (total EE) range between 0.6 and 0.7 nM (Belle et al., 2002). Moreover, Jurima et al. (1985) have reported that EE itself is a weak inhibitor (K i ϳ100 M) of human liver microsomal mephenytoin (racemate) hydroxylase activity, whereas Laine et al. (2003) observed inhibition (70%) of omeprazole 5-hydroxylation only at a high concentration of EE (0.1 mM). We have also determined that EE is a relatively weak, reversible inhibitor (IC 50 ϭ 19 M) of CYP2C19 (4Ј-hydroxylation of (S)-mephenytoin) in human liver microsomes. The IC 50 was determined at the...