“…On the other hand, intestinal ACE, which is present in high concentration on the microvilli (Defendini et al, 1983;Ward et al, 1980) and may, by the generation of All, be involved in fluid and sodium absorption (Crocker & Munday, 1970), or function as a digestive peptidase (Yoshioka et al, 1987), is vulnerable to inhibition by orally active agents (Sakaguchi et al, 1988;Stevens et al, 1988), although this does not appear to have any pathophysiological consequences (Gavras & Gavras, 1988). Where ACE and the RAS are associated with the immune system, the administration of ACE inhibitors results in suppression of granulomatous inflammation, which was beneficial when associated with a nonreplicating antigen such as schistosoma eggs (Weinstock & Boros, 1981) or BCG inoculum (Schrier et al, 1982), but worsened the severity of acute infection with the yeast Histoplasma capsulatum (Deepe et al, 1985). Lastly, ovarian ACE may be inhibited by orally active ACE inhibitors, since in the ovary there is no barrier comparable to the blood-testis barrier (Richards, 1980).…”