In 1991, Medite of New Mexico requested a NIOSH health hazard evaluation (HHE) to evaluate employee exposures to formaldehyde during fiberboard manufacturing at its Las Vegas, New Mexico, facility. NIOSH investigators conducted two site visits at the facility, which included exposure monitoring, in 1991 and 1993. The objective of the NIOSH study was to assess occupational exposures to formaldehyde, formaldehyde on dust (FDust), inhalable dust and total dust (as soft wood dust) before and after process and engineering control changes implemented by the company to reduce worker formaldehyde exposures. The study was also designed to provide a comparison of two analytical methods for measuring formaldehyde on resin-treated wood dusts.The range for 13 personal breathing zone (PBZ) exposures for formaldehyde (includes both site visits) was 0.029 -0.48 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m 3 ); wood dust (as total dust) exposures ranged from none detected to 21.03 mg/m 3 ; inhalable dust exposures ranged from 0.307 to 24.1 mg/m 3 ; and FDust exposures ranged from none detected to 0.09 mg/m 3 . Workers in four job categories and five areas were sampled during both site visits, and results for formaldehyde, total dust (wood dust), and inhalable dust were compared (four additional job categories were sampled during the second visit). The mean formaldehyde concentration in PBZ and area air samples during the first site visit (0.38 mg/m 3 ) was significantly higher than the mean during the follow up visit (0.25 mg/m 3 , p=0.002, paired t-test). No worker's exposure exceeded the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) action level, 0.5 parts per million (ppm), although full-shift exposures greater than the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists Threshold Limit Value ceiling limit (ACGIH TLV-C) were measured for two of eight job categories, and it is quite likely that the ceiling limit was exceeded for three other job categories. The mean total dust (wood dust) concentration during the first site visit (3.77 mg/m 3 ) did not differ significantly from the mean during the second site visit (1.80 mg/m 3 , p=0.30, paired ttest). Wood dust exposures exceeded the NIOSH REL of 1 mg/m 3 for one of four workers during the first visit, and for seven of nine workers sampled during the second site visit.Paired FDust results for 28 air samples indicated that the results from NIOSH Method 5700 were significantly higher than those from another published method (Elia et al.), with means of 0.081 mg/m 3 and 0.012 mg/m 3 , respectively (p=0.01, paired t-test). The ratio of NIOSH/Elia results ranged from approximately 2 to 18 in individual air samples, however, the results from the two methods were highly correlated (r=0.98).This Health Hazard Evaluation (HHE) report and any recommendations made herein are for the specific facility evaluated and may not be universally applicable. Any recommendations made are not to be considered as final statements of NIOSH policy or of any agency or individual involved.Additional HHE...