2013
DOI: 10.1179/1754762813y.0000000050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impedance changes in chronically implanted and stimulated cochlear implant electrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
58
2
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
58
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes in impedance related to the tissue-to-electrode interface and surrounding environment of the cochlea have been reported in several studies [58]. In our previous study, we found a significant drop in impedance during initial mapping within 24 hours after cochlear implantation which may have been related to spontaneous recovery of the micro-environment inside the cochlea and a divergence effect of electrical stimulation after the device had been switched on [9].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Changes in impedance related to the tissue-to-electrode interface and surrounding environment of the cochlea have been reported in several studies [58]. In our previous study, we found a significant drop in impedance during initial mapping within 24 hours after cochlear implantation which may have been related to spontaneous recovery of the micro-environment inside the cochlea and a divergence effect of electrical stimulation after the device had been switched on [9].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…This has been studied before both in vivo and in vitro, (14,15) but not at such a high temporal resolution for extended periods of time in a preclinical model. This could potentially lead to improved outcomes for patients as knowledge of temporal changes in the electrodetissue interface and associated safety limitations improves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impedance spectroscopy is also suitable for the characterization of DBS electrodes [26] and the encapsulation process of DBS electrodes [33,34]. After implantation, the impedances of DBS [35] or cochlear electrodes [36,37] tend to increase. Typically, the foreign body reaction in rats and, in turn, the electrode impedance stabilize after several weeks [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, the foreign body reaction in rats and, in turn, the electrode impedance stabilize after several weeks [38]. This stabilization process has been demonstrated to be perturbed by electrical stimulation in DBS [39] and intra-cochlear electrodes [37,40]. For an optimal adjustment of DBS signals, the kinetics of the resulting electrode-impedance changes by the adventitia formation must be taken into account [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%