2022
DOI: 10.3390/mps5040056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impedance Measures for Detecting Electrical Responses during Acute Injury and Exposure of Compounds to Roots of Plants

Abstract: Electrical activity is widely used for assessing a plant’s response to an injury or environmental stimulus. Commonly, a differential electrode recording between silver wire leads with the reference wire connected to the soil, or a part of the plant, is used. One method uses KCl-filled glass electrodes placed into the plant, similar to recording membrane/cell potentials in animal tissues. This method is more susceptible to artifacts of equipment noise and photoelectric effects than an impedance measure. An impe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, one may wish to try different recording arrangements to determine what is optimal for the experimental design and questions being addressed [ 7 ]. It is known that an injury or physical disturbance to a plant, via a cut to a leaf or even the bending of a leaf, generates electrical signals which can be monitored using an impedance measure as well as with the insertion of a glass electrode in reference to the outside of the plant [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one may wish to try different recording arrangements to determine what is optimal for the experimental design and questions being addressed [ 7 ]. It is known that an injury or physical disturbance to a plant, via a cut to a leaf or even the bending of a leaf, generates electrical signals which can be monitored using an impedance measure as well as with the insertion of a glass electrode in reference to the outside of the plant [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%