1995
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(94)00474-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impeller-agitated aerobic reactor: The influence of tiny bubbles on gas hold-up and mass transfer in highly viscous liquids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
15
1
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
6
15
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This last behavior is identical with that obtained with Rushton turbines 19 and can be attributed to the nearly bimodal bubble-size distribution: 5,34,35 while the smallest bubbles are easily entrained in the circulating liquid, the bigger ones reside in the tank for a shorter time. 13 The model is not adequate, therefore, to describe these systems; no attempt was made to interpret these conditions with a more reliable one.…”
Section: Influence Of Working Conditions and System Properties Onsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This last behavior is identical with that obtained with Rushton turbines 19 and can be attributed to the nearly bimodal bubble-size distribution: 5,34,35 while the smallest bubbles are easily entrained in the circulating liquid, the bigger ones reside in the tank for a shorter time. 13 The model is not adequate, therefore, to describe these systems; no attempt was made to interpret these conditions with a more reliable one.…”
Section: Influence Of Working Conditions and System Properties Onsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The extent of this overall change is higher with higher viscosity (up to the maximum value investigated of 120 mPa‚s). This is likely related to the variable structure of the holdup with operating parameters and viscosity 5,34 and its complex relationship with the overall circulation, coalescence rate, and liquid entraining capability for the gas. Because of this complexity, no simple mathematical link between these parameters was found.…”
Section: Influence Of the Working Conditions Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16 Some workers14, 16 have considered that the irregularity in the effect of µ on ϕ gD may be brought about mainly by differences in bubble characteristics, depending on the range of µ. Other observations reported17–19 include the fact that in viscous liquids, while many tiny bubbles (diameter of the order of 0.1–3 mm) tend to accumulate during aeration and circulate with the liquid, large bubbles of the order of 10 mm or greater are also liable to form in the bulk liquid. This suggests that the gas hold‐up structure in the system with aerated viscous liquids may be bimodal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in such fluids, the gas hold-up structure is known to be very different from the one observed in water and other low-viscosity liquids: many tiny bubbles appear to accumulate during aeration and circulate with the liquid while large bubbles are also observed (bimodal bubble population). These tiny bubbles can actively contribute to mass transfer, depending whether they are in equilibrium with the level of dissolved solute in the liquid phase (high residence times) or not [26].…”
Section: Chemical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%