2022
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2022.3193449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imperceptible Transfer Attack and Defense on 3D Point Cloud Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To demonstrate the imperceptibility of our NormalAttack, we compare the distance metrics with FGSM, I-FGSM [36], 3D-ADV [11], GeoA 3 [32], and ITA * [34]. e results reported in Table 1 show that all these methods can achieve 100% attack success rates.…”
Section: Quantitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To demonstrate the imperceptibility of our NormalAttack, we compare the distance metrics with FGSM, I-FGSM [36], 3D-ADV [11], GeoA 3 [32], and ITA * [34]. e results reported in Table 1 show that all these methods can achieve 100% attack success rates.…”
Section: Quantitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differently, they enforce the perturbation to be attached to the manifold, while our NormalAttack attempts to destroy the manifold. We notice a concurrent work [34] that also moves points along normals. Differently, instead of strictly restrict the moving direction, we allow points to be slightly shifted along the tangent plane, such that more feasible solutions can be searched.…”
Section: Geometry-aware Adversarial Attacksmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations