“…On the other, it is intimately linked with world affairs, and, most especially: the failure by the end of the twentieth century of almost all Marx's predictions concerning social and political development; 84 the implications for academic history of the working methods of feminism 85 and, later, postmodernism; 86 and the location of Western historians in what, by the 1980s, were starting to become self-consciously 'postcolonial' societies. 87 Within this broad context, and for several more specific reasons, it has remained the norm in Britain over the past decade for historians of education to uphold a public commitment to a wide definition of their field. In this way, Roy Lowe could remain true to the verity of the 1960s that only by this means could historians of education position themselves in the mainstream of social history (a battle fought and lost in England in the mid-1970s 88 ) while, for a new generation, Gary McCulloch, Joyce Goodman and Jane Martin could value breadth of study for the interdisciplinary engagements that it promised across the humanities and social sciences, and beyond the boundaries of the nation-state.…”