2022
DOI: 10.1186/s13007-022-00965-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IMPLANT: a new technique for transgene copy number estimation in plants using a single end-point PCR reaction

Abstract: Background Copy number determination is one of the first steps in the characterization of transgenic plant lines. The classical approach to this, Southern blotting, is time-consuming, expensive and requires massive amounts of high-quality genomic DNA. Other PCR-based techniques are either inaccurate, laborious, or expensive. Results Here, we propose a new technique, IMPLANT (Insertion of competitive PCR calibrator for copy number estimation), a com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this does occur, it is not as common as might be assumed. Studies across different species have found only between 20-50% of transgenic plants having such simple insertions (Cluster et al, 1996;De Saeger et al, 2022;Flachowsky et al, 2008;Forsbach et al, 2003;Jones et al, 1987;Olhoft et al, 2004). Instead, it has been known for decades that complex insertions frequently arise involving the inclusion of multiple T-DNA copies at a single locus (i.e., T-DNA concatenation), the insertion of T-DNA sequence fragments, or both (Afolabi et al, 2004;De Buck et al, 1999;De Neve et al, 1997;Flachowsky et al, 2008;Gheysen et al, 1990;Holsters et al, 1983;Jones et al, 1987;Jorgensen et al, 1987;Olhoft et al, 2004;Simpson et al, 1986).…”
Section: Structure Of T-dna Insertionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While this does occur, it is not as common as might be assumed. Studies across different species have found only between 20-50% of transgenic plants having such simple insertions (Cluster et al, 1996;De Saeger et al, 2022;Flachowsky et al, 2008;Forsbach et al, 2003;Jones et al, 1987;Olhoft et al, 2004). Instead, it has been known for decades that complex insertions frequently arise involving the inclusion of multiple T-DNA copies at a single locus (i.e., T-DNA concatenation), the insertion of T-DNA sequence fragments, or both (Afolabi et al, 2004;De Buck et al, 1999;De Neve et al, 1997;Flachowsky et al, 2008;Gheysen et al, 1990;Holsters et al, 1983;Jones et al, 1987;Jorgensen et al, 1987;Olhoft et al, 2004;Simpson et al, 1986).…”
Section: Structure Of T-dna Insertionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also often multiple T‐DNA integration events per transformation event. Notably, the segregation ratios of Arabidopsis plants transformed by floral dip seem to suggest that around 20% of T1 plants have multiple independent T‐DNA insertions (De Saeger et al., 2022; Ondrej et al., 1999). In other species, these estimates are considerably higher but are often limited by small sample sizes.…”
Section: Structure Of T‐dna Insertionsmentioning
confidence: 99%