1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(99)90063-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implant fixation by bone ingrowth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
217
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 374 publications
(222 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
2
217
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…15 However, long-term stability and survival of cementless implants depends on osseointegration. 16 One way to enhance osseointegration could be through preservation of the autograft created in situ by the bone compaction technique. 14 We have previously, in a 4-week study, shown that local application of the bisphosphonate alendronate can preserve this autograft.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 However, long-term stability and survival of cementless implants depends on osseointegration. 16 One way to enhance osseointegration could be through preservation of the autograft created in situ by the bone compaction technique. 14 We have previously, in a 4-week study, shown that local application of the bisphosphonate alendronate can preserve this autograft.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These macropores are well suited for bone ingrowth, where several scholars reported that the optimum pore size range is 100-400 micron, while some extend this range up to 500 microns [21]. Furthermore, the presence of micropores can be of potential benefit as it has been found that micropores as small as 50 µm can promote blood vessel growth within the implant [5,6]. …”
Section: Results and Discussion Figure 2 Transverse Cross-section Bementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of pores in the structure of the foams can solve this and also promote bone ingrowth as well as cell attachment and consequently, improve the osseo-integration of these implants [3]. Although the optimum size of pores for bone ingrowth is still under debate, several studies reported that the ideal size range is about 100-400 µm [4][5][6]. Almost all production processes for titanium foams use metal powder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coupled with this, there is an increasing need for the treatment of younger and more active patients, which places greater demands on the implants used. Long‐term implant success in these younger and more active patients depends greatly on effective biological fixation by bone in growth (Kienapfel et al, 1999; McLaughlin and Lee, 2011). In order to achieve this, surgeons use cementless press‐fit prostheses with surface modifications to promote bone in‐growth as well as initial primary fixation by mechanical interlocking (Sammons, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%