Implant site development requirements in an advanced dental education program: A series of 290 implants

Muñoz, Sergio; Dutner, Joseph M.; Lancaster, Douglas D; Lincicum, Adam R; Stancoven, Brian W

doi:10.1002/jdd.12952

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In such cases, clinicians have considerable flexibil-ity in selection of devices, materials, and techniques. A surgeon may or may not choose a specialized flap design, 36,37 an adjunct for space provision, 38,39 a nonabsorbable (NM) (Figures 6-8) or absorbable membrane (AM) (Figures 9-12), 6,15,17 and an autogenous graft or a bone derivative (allogeneic or xenogeneic). 15,17,34,35 Operator preference and an appraisal of patient-and site-specific factors may determine the GBR technique and materials selected.…”

Section: Clinical Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Such defects arise through various etiologies including periodontitis, pulpal disease, cysts and tumors, trauma, tooth agenesis, and tooth loss 1–3 . In perspective, over half of implant sites may require some form of bone augmentation, alveolar ridge augmentation (ARA) representing the predominant treatment need 4–6 . Alveolar ridge deficiency (ARD) is clinically relevant even when implants are not included in the treatment plan.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[1][2][3] In perspective, over half of implant sites may require some form of bone augmentation, alveolar ridge augmentation (ARA) representing the predominant treatment need. [4][5][6] Published 2023. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Clinical protocol selection for alveolar ridge augmentation at sites exhibiting slight, moderate, and severe horizontal ridge deficiencies

Vargas

Pfaff

Bumpers

et al. 2023

Clin Adv Periodontics

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Focused clinical questionWhat factors identify the optimal bone augmentation techniques for managing slight, moderate, and severe horizontal alveolar ridge deficiency (ARD) at dental implant sites?SummaryHorizontal ARD is a concern at a high proportion of sites receiving dental implants, and clinicians have developed a variety of surgical procedures to address such defects. In a particular case, selection of the optimal treatment may depend predominantly on defect severity, location (anterior versus posterior), and configuration (contained versus noncontained). This report provides a framework for selecting an augmentation method when presented with a slight, moderate, or severe horizontal ARD at a site requiring dental implant placement.ConclusionMultiple treatment options are available for planned implant sites exhibiting horizontal ARD; severe posterior and slight anterior defects intuitively call for different approaches. Although rigid guidelines for selecting the optimal augmentation method do not exist, some techniques are poorly suited for esthetically demanding sites. A framework considering defect severity, location, and configuration may help guide clinical decisions on this topic.

show abstract

Section: Clinical Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Clinical protocol selection for alveolar ridge augmentation at sites exhibiting slight, moderate, and severe horizontal ridge deficiencies

Vargas

Pfaff

Bumpers

et al. 2023

Clin Adv Periodontics

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On considère que l'épaisseur osseuse en périphérie de l'implant doit être comprise entre 1 et 2 mm afin de limiter la résorption osseuse péri-implantaire et l'apparition de complications à long terme. Plusieurs études cliniques ont montré que le volume osseux disponible avant la pose d'un implant dentaire est insuffisant dans 50 % à 80 % des cas [2][3][4] et que le recours à une greffe osseuse de plus ou moins grande étendue est alors nécessaire. De nombreuses techniques chirurgicales sont utilisées pour reconstruire les pertes osseuses alvéolaires.…”

unclassified

Impression 3D et bioimpression pour la régénération osseuse en chirurgie orale

Catros,

Fénelon,

De Oliveira

et al. 2024

Med Sci (Paris)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La chirurgie osseuse pré-implantaire en chirurgie orale permet de reconstruire les atrophies des maxillaires en rapport avec des processus traumatiques, infectieux ou tumoraux. Dans ce contexte, le biomatériau idéal reste l’os autogène mais les biomatériaux (d’origine naturelle ou synthétique) permettent de limiter la morbidité liée aux prélèvements osseux et de simplifier ces interventions chirurgicales. Dans cet article, nous illustrons l’apport récent de l’impression 3D dans ce contexte pour traiter des défauts osseux de forme complexe ou pour créer des modèles anatomiques servant à planifier les interventions. Enfin, les perspectives apportées par l’ingénierie tissulaire et la bioimpression (création de modèles in vitro complexes) sont détaillées.

show abstract

Periodontists and oral surgeons’ peri‐implantitis‐related education, knowledge, attitudes, and professional behavior: A national survey

Polymeri,

Marti,

Aronovich

et al. 2024

Journal of Dental Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesEach year, approximately 5 million dental implants are placed in the United States and one out of three patients is likely to experience peri‐implantitis (PI). The objectives were to compare the PI‐related education, knowledge, attitudes, and professional behavior of periodontists and oral maxillofacial surgeons (OMS), and to explore relationships between these constructs of interest.MethodsA total of 389 periodontists and 161 OMS responded to a web‐based survey. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses (independent sample t‐tests, chi‐square tests, and correlational analyses) were conducted.ResultsOn average, periodontists reported a higher percentage of time spent in residency on implant surgery (21.02% vs. 7.27%; p < 0.001), better education about PI (5‐point scale with 1 = not at all well: means: 2.86 vs. 2.59; p < 0.001), and better knowledge of risk factors (4.07 vs. 3.86; p < 0.001) than OMS. Periodontists argued that oral hygiene‐related treatment (4.45 vs. 4.22; p = 0.001) and regeneration‐focused treatments such as guided tissue regeneration (3.62 vs. 3.20; p < 0.001) contributed more to successfully treating PI and used these treatments more in their practices (4.86 vs. 4.56; p < 0.001/3.06 vs. 2.68; p < 0.001) than OMS. They also considered PI as a more serious problem than OMS (4.55 vs. 3.80; p < 0.001). The better the respondents’ PI‐related knowledge was, the more they considered PI as a serious problem (r = 0.19; p < 0.001). The more cases they treated per month, the more they considered PI as a serious problem (r = 0.19; p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe results of the present study highlight the lack of standardization in the specialty training of periodontists and OMS. Best practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of PI are needed to optimize graduate education about this important topic.

show abstract

Implant site development requirements in an advanced dental education program: A series of 290 implants

Cited by 3 publications

References 42 publications

Clinical protocol selection for alveolar ridge augmentation at sites exhibiting slight, moderate, and severe horizontal ridge deficiencies

Clinical protocol selection for alveolar ridge augmentation at sites exhibiting slight, moderate, and severe horizontal ridge deficiencies

Impression 3D et bioimpression pour la régénération osseuse en chirurgie orale

Periodontists and oral surgeons’ peri‐implantitis‐related education, knowledge, attitudes, and professional behavior: A national survey

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About