2000
DOI: 10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implant Survival to 36 Months as Related to Length and Diameter

Abstract: The results indicate that: 1) shorter implants had statistically lower survival rates as compared with longer implants; 2) 3+ mm diameter implants had a lower survival rate as compared with 4+ mm implants; 3) 3+ mm diameter implants are less stable (more positive PTVs) than 4+ mm implants; and 4) there was no significant difference in crestal bone loss for the two different implant diameters between placement and uncovering.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
130
7
16

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
130
7
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The survival of the implants involves the following factors as well: the experience of the implantology center (multicenter study) [1,6], the dimensions of the implants (length, diameter) [19], the use of single or combined implants in the prosthetic phase [12], the place of implanting [6,7] and the habit of smoking [8,14]. At the same time, other publications have not demonstrated the effect of the above-mentioned and other factors on the survival of implants [4,5,7,9,13,18].…”
Section: Current Issues In Pharmacy and Medical Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survival of the implants involves the following factors as well: the experience of the implantology center (multicenter study) [1,6], the dimensions of the implants (length, diameter) [19], the use of single or combined implants in the prosthetic phase [12], the place of implanting [6,7] and the habit of smoking [8,14]. At the same time, other publications have not demonstrated the effect of the above-mentioned and other factors on the survival of implants [4,5,7,9,13,18].…”
Section: Current Issues In Pharmacy and Medical Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 Several reports suggest that higher failure rates are associated with the use of short implants. 3,30,31 Microstrains, which are concentrated at the bone-implant interface, may result in microfractures that may result in eventual loss of the involved implant if not allowed to repair. Cortical bone is denser, stronger, and repairs at a slower rate compared with trabecular bone.…”
Section: Clinical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small diameter implants are often chosen for cases where there is a reduced availability of alveolar ridge width or interdental space. However, the reduced surface area for osseointegration [22,23] and the increased risk for implant fracture [24,25] in such cases may contradict the use of small diameter implants. However, mechanical tests have shown higher tensile and fatigue strength of zirconium compared to pure titanium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%