2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implant-to-bone force transmission: a pilot study for in vivo strain gauge measurement technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…erefore, there is less stress in the abutment screws as compared to the external butt joint. e cold welding inherent to this system favors the torque gain as the friction between the internal implant surfaces and the conical abutment, which makes high stability [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…erefore, there is less stress in the abutment screws as compared to the external butt joint. e cold welding inherent to this system favors the torque gain as the friction between the internal implant surfaces and the conical abutment, which makes high stability [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, modern implant designs and surfaces have reduced the reliance on length to achieve adequate primary stability (Abboud et al, 2020). Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that the biomechanical forces from occlusion around dental implants are concentrated around the first 6‐8 mm of bone‐implant contact, and it is suggested that additional implant length beyond this may be superfluous once osseointegration has occurred (Anitua et al, 2010; Cozzolino et al, 2019; Himmlová et al, 2004; Moriwaki et al, 2016). Based on numerous systematic reviews, implants equal to or less than 8 mm in length have survival similar to that of longer implants (Fan et al, 2017; Renouard & Nisand, 2006; Thoma et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of strain-gauge in both in vitro and in vivo strain assessment is documented. (12,32,44,45) Owing to the small size and linearity of the resistance rate change, strain gauge analysis is one of the best possible tools for assessing microscopic deformation with minimal intervention during testing. (34) Additionally, strain gauges give quantitative strain assessments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%