1989
DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(89)90256-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implantable electrical left ventricular assist systems: Bridge to transplantation and future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
49
0
5

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
49
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The pump moves blood from the LV to aortic arch where it flows normally through the patient's arterial system. Short-term use of these devices in patients awaiting transplantation can maintain hemodynamics, improve vital organ function and exercise tolerance, allow patients to be discharged from the hospital, and provides them with a reasonable quality of life and a relatively low incidence of major adverse events (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). Table 1 is showing a summary of some types of ventricular assist device.…”
Section: Ventricular Assist Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pump moves blood from the LV to aortic arch where it flows normally through the patient's arterial system. Short-term use of these devices in patients awaiting transplantation can maintain hemodynamics, improve vital organ function and exercise tolerance, allow patients to be discharged from the hospital, and provides them with a reasonable quality of life and a relatively low incidence of major adverse events (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). Table 1 is showing a summary of some types of ventricular assist device.…”
Section: Ventricular Assist Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NIH-sponsored programs for long-term support bore fruit in 1984 with successful deployment of the electric, pulsatile Novacor LVAD as a BTT. 8 That same year the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services codified distinct strategies for mechanical support to guide device development and regulatory approval (Table 1). By the mid-1990s, FDA had approved multiple pulsatile platforms allowing patients to recover from postcardiotomy shock or bridge to cardiac transplant.…”
Section: History Of Mechanical Circulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the mid-1990s, FDA had approved multiple pulsatile platforms allowing patients to recover from postcardiotomy shock or bridge to cardiac transplant. 8 The expansion of durable LVAD options for patients with advanced heart failure came just as the significant shortage of donor hearts was becoming apparent. The advanced heart failure epidemic in the United States has been estimated to include 100 000 to 250 000 patients with refractory New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IIIB or IV symptoms.…”
Section: History Of Mechanical Circulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research had demonstrated that LVAD technology could provide a relative survival benefit of approximately 30% for selected patients awaiting heart transplantation. 77,78 Following improvements in technology and the pivotal REMATCH trial which showed a 48% relative reduction in death for patients with Class IV HF and left ventricular systolic dysfunction who were randomized to the HeartMate VE pulsatile-flow LVAD compared with medical therapy, 79 the FDA in 2003 approved a pulsatile-flow LVAD for "destination" therapy. Over the remainder of the decade, pulsatile-flow LVAD technology improved with resultant reductions in percutaneous lead breaks and serious mechanical failures.…”
Section: Ventricular Assist Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%