2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2005.04.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implantation and annealing of aluminum in 4H silicon carbide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon comparing these roughness values with those obtained after conventional uncapped and AlN/graphite capped annealings (not shown), the following observations can be made. Roughness increase in the microwave annealed samples is much lower than in the uncapped conventional furnace-annealed samples [11,12], which show an increase in roughness of $15 times the value of the as-implanted sample for 1700°C/15 min annealing [7]. Roughness increase after uncapped microwave annealing of this work is comparable with the surface roughness obtained after furnace annealing using a graphite or AlN cap [13,14].…”
Section: Surface Roughness Of the Microwave Annealed Samplessupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Upon comparing these roughness values with those obtained after conventional uncapped and AlN/graphite capped annealings (not shown), the following observations can be made. Roughness increase in the microwave annealed samples is much lower than in the uncapped conventional furnace-annealed samples [11,12], which show an increase in roughness of $15 times the value of the as-implanted sample for 1700°C/15 min annealing [7]. Roughness increase after uncapped microwave annealing of this work is comparable with the surface roughness obtained after furnace annealing using a graphite or AlN cap [13,14].…”
Section: Surface Roughness Of the Microwave Annealed Samplessupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Due to the sublimation problem, the maximum annealing temperatures employed during conventional furnace annealing are limited to 61650°C [1,2]. Consequently, sheet resistivities of p-type dopants in SiC have remained in the 10 4 X/h range [5][6][7]. Clearly, these values are too high for fabricating efficient SiC power devices [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum roughness measured in the microwave annealed samples is 2.1 times the roughness value measured on the as-implanted sample ͑0.96 nm͒. The roughness increase in the microwave-annealed samples is much lower than the values observed earlier [12][13][14] for uncapped conventional furnace anneals ͑which show an increase in roughness of ϳ15 times the as-implanted value͒. The roughness increase after uncapped microwave annealing in this work is comparable to the surface roughness measured earlier after furnace annealing using a graphite 15 or AlN ͑Ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…5(a)). These furrows are supposed to be caused by the thermal desorption of species such as Si, SiC 2 , Si 2 C, etc, a mechanism which is popularly known as 'step bunching' (Capano et al, 1999;Rao et al, 1999;Vathulya and White, 2000;Rambach et al, 2005). The step bunching puts fabrication constraints on SiC devices (Phelps et al, 2002).…”
Section: Surface Roughness Of Microwave Annealed Sic and Ganmentioning
confidence: 99%