RationaleDirect visualisation of ciliary beat pattern (CBP) and ciliary beat frequency (CBF) has been recommended as firstline diagnostic test in patients suspected of having primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD). However, the test procedure is not yet completely standardised and centers measure the CBF at different temperatures.ObjectivesIt was the aim of the study to compare CBF at different temperatures, to establish normative values, to check for age dependency and to measure the temperature on the nasal mucosa of the participants.MethodsHigh-speed video-microscopy analysis with a SAVA system was used to determine CBP and CBF in the participants.MeasurementsNasal brushings were taken and CBF was measured in randomised order at the three temperatures 25°C, 32°C and 37°C.Main Results100 healthy young adults (74f, 26 m), aged 20,2–31,9 years, were included in the study. We found a highly significant difference among the groups, the median CBF was 7,0 Hz at 25°C, 7,6 Hz at 32°C and 8,0 Hz at 37°C. The maximum time period ex vivo was 65 min and did not differ significantly. However, CBF was significantly higher when the cilia were kept at a higher temperature before the measurements were made. We found no correlation between CBF and the age of the participants. The median nasal mucosal temperature in our study participants was 30,2°C (range 24,7–35,8) comparable to 30,2–34,4°C described in the literature.ConclusionsThe most appropriate temperature to measure CBF is 32°C. In our study the 95% confidence interval for this temperature was 6,3–9,0 Hz.