2011
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/274/1/012134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation and comparison of dynamic and static light scattering techniques for polidisperse particle sizing using a CCD camera

Abstract: Abstract. Laser techniques for particle sizing are used in industrial as well as in scientific applications due to the direct connection between the measured quantities in light dispersion processes and particle properties. We have successfully implemented two light scattering techniques, adapted to function with a CCD camera as detector: the dynamic technique, studies the temporal correlation of the scattered light in a fixed direction (known as DLS for "Dynamic Light Scattering"); the static technique, retri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The particle size determined from MALS, properly called a radius of gyration, is often similar to that measured by DLS (Kato and others ). The primary advantage of MALS is that it is faster than DLS and can be slightly more sensitive (Alvarez and others ). As such, it is most often encountered in combination with a chromatographic separation technique such as asymmetric field flow fractionation (aFFF), which allows one to separate a sample of ENMs by size and measure in real time from the size of each fraction before directly aspirating into an ICP‐MS for elemental analysis, as a study by Schmidt and others () related to detection of clays migrated from food contact materials.…”
Section: Available Methods To Evaluate Enm Characteristics In and Uptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The particle size determined from MALS, properly called a radius of gyration, is often similar to that measured by DLS (Kato and others ). The primary advantage of MALS is that it is faster than DLS and can be slightly more sensitive (Alvarez and others ). As such, it is most often encountered in combination with a chromatographic separation technique such as asymmetric field flow fractionation (aFFF), which allows one to separate a sample of ENMs by size and measure in real time from the size of each fraction before directly aspirating into an ICP‐MS for elemental analysis, as a study by Schmidt and others () related to detection of clays migrated from food contact materials.…”
Section: Available Methods To Evaluate Enm Characteristics In and Uptmentioning
confidence: 99%