“…See Table S1. Thirteen studies had a total quality score between 60% and 86% (Galik et al, 2008; Guidetti & Ytterberg, 2011; Hafsteinsdóttir, Algra, Kappelle, & Grypdonck, 2005; Hedman, Eriksson, von Koch, & Guidetti, 2019; Henskens, Nauta, Drost, & Scherder, 2018; Henskens, Nauta, Scherder, Oosterveld, & Vrijkotte, 2017; Henskens, Nauta, van Eekeren, & Scherder, 2018; Kerse et al, 2008; Parsons, Sheridan, Rouse, Robinson, & Connolly, 2013; Peri et al, 2008; Resnick et al, 2006; Resnick, Galik, Gruber‐Baldini, & Zimmerman, 2009; Tuntland, Aaslund, Espehaug, Førland, & Kjeken, 2015), and seven studies had a quality score between 40% and 59% (Bertilsson et al, 2014; Galik, Resnick, Hammersla, & Brightwater, 2013; Galik, Resnick, Lerner, Hammersla, & Gruber‐Baldini, 2015; Resnick, Gruber‐Baldini, et al, 2009; Resnick, Galik, Gruber‐Baldini, & Zimmerman, 2011; Sidani, Streiner, & LeClerc, 2012; Tinetti et al, 2002). Four studies fulfilled less than 40% of the quality criteria and were excluded from the review (Engelman, Mathews, & Altus, 2002; Johnson et al, 2004; Lim, 2003; Padula, Hughes, & Baumhover, 2009).…”