Implementation and Effects of Pedagogical Translanguaging in EFL Classrooms: A Systematic Review

Abstract

In response to calls for more research to assess the effects of translanguaging on substantive learning outcomes, this systematic review begins that process by synthesising existing research on pedagogical translanguaging approaches that have been formally assessed for effectiveness in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classrooms. A systematic process of searching and selecting the literature found 10 eligible studies. Data were extracted for narrative synthesis and quality appraisal. Results showed that pedagogical translanguaging was most frequently used to teach reading and writing rather than other domains. Five studies favoured translanguaging over English-only approaches, four of which were rated as having a high risk of bias. The remaining studies either detected no statistically significant differences between these approaches or favoured translanguaging in a small number of highly specific measures. We conclude that pedagogical translanguaging may be helpful in teaching in some circumstances, but that the low methodological quality of the literature on average makes it difficult to draw firm causal inferences. This systematic review provides the relevant background on what is already known about the effects of pedagogical translanguaging in EFL contexts to inform the work of researchers wishing to act on recommendations for more intervention research to establish the effects of the approach on English language outcomes.

Judging the relative trustworthiness of research results: How to do it and why it matters

“…The standard of evidence looked for must be at least as strong as reviewers would accept for established 'facts' in real life. The sieve has now been used widely and formally by research teams to assist in their reviews of evidence since 2014(e.g., El Soufi & See, 2019Fan & See, 2022;Huang & Chalmers, 2023;Neelen & Kirschner, 2020;Owen et al, 2022;See et al, 2022;Siddiqui & Ventista, 2018), as well as by countless PhD students in their theses. It has been explained in videos for specific areas like evidence on second language learning (Chalmers, 2016), and discussed widely on social media in fields beyond education and social science (e.g., https:// twitt er.…”

Reducing ‘avoidable research waste’ in applied linguistics research: Insights from healthcare research

“…This failure to take appropriate steps to minimise bias in healthcare research, where these design considerations are generally well-understood, is concerning. In applied linguistics research, it is still all too common to find research that has not taken appropriate steps to minimise the potential for biases to mislead (see, for example, the risk of bias appraisals in Chalmers, 2019;Huang & Chalmers, 2023). Of course, researchers working within any research paradigm should do what they can to ensure that their work is rigorous and fair.…”

Translanguaging In Indonesian EFL Classrooms: A Comparative Case Study Of Pedagogical Strategies And Linguistic Identity

“…Studies that have been carried out by contemporary academics have shown that translanguaging has the inherent capability to harness the linguistic talents of pupils effectively and successfully. Despite the statements that have been made about the influence of translanguaging on the academic and pedagogical results of students, the actual implementation of this concept is often disregarded by practitioners (Creese & Blackledge, 2010; Danping, 2019; García & Wei, 2014; Huang & Chalmers, 2023).According to Johnson and Martinez (2020), the term "translanguaging" refers to a communication technique that involves the intentional and systematic use of a person's multilingual talents with communication. García and Wei (2014) emphasize that it enables the smooth representation of concepts across many language systems, adding to the benefits of this technology.…”