1990
DOI: 10.1016/0168-9002(90)90096-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation and effects of undulator scanning at Aladdin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The linear coupling must therefore be held constant to 2% of its value; for APS the nominal 10% coupling must remain in the range 9.8%-10.2% to fulfill this criterion. The undesirable consequences of a beam size change caused by magnetic imperfections in an ID, at SRC in Stoughton, Wisconsin, were reported by Trzeciak, et al [9]. Ironically the increased coupling caused by changing the gap of the ID improved the beam lifetime by increasing the volume of the bunch and thereby reducing the Touschek loss rate.…”
Section: In Undulator Imperfectionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The linear coupling must therefore be held constant to 2% of its value; for APS the nominal 10% coupling must remain in the range 9.8%-10.2% to fulfill this criterion. The undesirable consequences of a beam size change caused by magnetic imperfections in an ID, at SRC in Stoughton, Wisconsin, were reported by Trzeciak, et al [9]. Ironically the increased coupling caused by changing the gap of the ID improved the beam lifetime by increasing the volume of the bunch and thereby reducing the Touschek loss rate.…”
Section: In Undulator Imperfectionsmentioning
confidence: 94%