Implementation and evaluation of a smoking cessation checklist implemented within Australian cancer services

Abstract

Introduction:The detrimental impact of smoking tobacco can be mitigated when cancer patients quit smoking. Smoking cessation clinical pathways are inconsistently implemented within Australian cancer services. The aim of this study was to pilot test and evaluate the reach, adoption, and implementation of a smoking cessation checklist within oncology services. Methods:The checklist was implemented over a 6-month period in medical and radiation oncology services at two metropolitan and one rural hospital. The RE-AIM framework guided the evaluation process. Implementation strategies included training, process mapping, and identifying champions. Evaluation measures included a clinical data audit, surveys, and semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals (HCPs).Results: Healthcare professionals (HCPs; N = 63; 41% oncologists, 32% nurses, 27% others) completed 1276 checklists with cancer patients between November 2019 and December 2020. Of the 126 (10%) identified current smokers, 34 (27%) accepted a referral to either Quitline, Nicotine Replacement Therapy, to a general practitioner or dedicated HCP for follow-up telephone support. There was variation in screening adoption by HCPs across the three hospitals, with 16%, 92% and 89.5% of patients screened respectively. Contextual factors, such as perceived commitment, role identity, and communication processes appeared to influence the outcomes. Conclusion:A checklist is a simple, effective, and versatile intervention used to standardise smoking cessation practices in medical and radiation oncology services. The checklist supports standardisation of referral practices to smoking cessation services for cancer patients by either oncologist and/or nurses.

Can improvement in delivery of smoking cessation care be sustained in psychiatry inpatient settings through a system change intervention? An analysis of statewide administrative health data

“…Previous research in psychiatry settings reported the routine provision of brief smoking cessation advice at moderate levels and smoking status documentation as low as 50%, even after implementing system change interventions, intensive staff training and highly targeted smoking cessation interventions (Lappin et al, 2020;Metse et al, 2018;Prochaska et al, 2004;Williams et al, 2015;Wye et al, 2009Wye et al, , 2010Wye et al, , 2017Young et al, 2022). However, our study found high smoking status documentation (88%) prior to the system change intervention, likely related to new laws in 2015 that prohibited smoking at Queensland hospitals, which motivated improved smoking status documentation for inpatients and development of the Pathway.…”

The Tobacco Endgame—A New Paradigm for Smoking Cessation in Cancer Clinics

“…An app specifically designed for cancer patients showed higher 2-month quit rates compared with a widely available general smoking cessation app when tested in a pilot randomised controlled trial [ 30 ]. Focussed training for health care workers and the appointment of “clinical champions” improved the implementation of a smoking cessation checklist in three Australian hospital oncology services, two metropolitan and one rural [ 31 ]. Systematic implementation of smoking cessation in cancer centres has not had extensive study and the Care to Quit Study, a stepped wedge cluster randomized, controlled trial (RCT), will investigate this across multiple sites in Australia [ 32 ].…”

A multidimensional assessment of payback: Evaluating the impact of Breast Cancer Trials

“…Cost‐benefit, cost‐analysis, and cost‐minimization analysis provide researchers with frameworks to guide economic evaluations, however, numerous design decisions remain in order to make any analysis achievable and appropriate 4 . In addition, these evaluations often focus on specific interventions or trials, 5 or comparisons across treatments 6–8 and the impact on patients, but not the impact at an organizational level where many trials are undertaken.…”