Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems
DOI: 10.1109/mmcs.1997.609602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation and evaluation of a multimedia file system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HERMES uses a variable-size block referred to as ''extent''. Tiger Shark [12] and MMFS [19] also use variable block size. In a certain circumstance, single hard disk drive supports soft real time I/O as well as legacy best-effort I/O request.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HERMES uses a variable-size block referred to as ''extent''. Tiger Shark [12] and MMFS [19] also use variable block size. In a certain circumstance, single hard disk drive supports soft real time I/O as well as legacy best-effort I/O request.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, MMFS is a single disk file system that adds continuous media support to a FreeBSD-based file system [29]. The Tiger Shark file system from IBM and XFS from SGI are results of commercial efforts to build integrated file systems [17,18].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a system typically stores a large number of videos in one or more servers [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. When a request for a video arrives, it is loaded from disks in a server and transmitted to the client in an isochronous stream [15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%