2019
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.22881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation and feasibility considerations of an avatar‐based intervention for military family caregivers

Abstract: Objective: Military family caregivers (MFCGs) are a growing population with well-being and quality of life (QOL) challenges. New technologies can help meet their needs while minimizing disruption to caregiving responsibilities. Preliminary research needs to address intervention implementation challenges before larger-scale efficacy studies are conducted. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of implementing an avatar-based intervention and preliminarily investigate outcomes. Methods: One-hundred twenty-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ironically, telepsychological approaches such as wearable devices may actually be more appealing to people holding negative views toward psychological treatment and who have less experience in help‐seeking (Hunkin, King, & Zajac, 2020). Other extremely promising web‐based approaches that have the potential to reach individuals not entering traditional treatment, or as a supplement to traditional treatment, are showcased in this special issue, including Acceptance and Commitment therapy for college students (Viskovich & Pakenham, 2020), an avatar‐based intervention for military family caregivers (Wilcox, 2020), and a self‐management positive psychology intervention (Görges, Oehler, von Hirschhausen, Hegerl, & Rummel‐Kluge, 2020). As Heesacker et al (2020) note, web‐based interventions such as these are showing respectable levels of feasibility and efficacy, although treatment computerization represents an extension of traditional mental health care providers, not a replacement.…”
Section: Telepsychology Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ironically, telepsychological approaches such as wearable devices may actually be more appealing to people holding negative views toward psychological treatment and who have less experience in help‐seeking (Hunkin, King, & Zajac, 2020). Other extremely promising web‐based approaches that have the potential to reach individuals not entering traditional treatment, or as a supplement to traditional treatment, are showcased in this special issue, including Acceptance and Commitment therapy for college students (Viskovich & Pakenham, 2020), an avatar‐based intervention for military family caregivers (Wilcox, 2020), and a self‐management positive psychology intervention (Görges, Oehler, von Hirschhausen, Hegerl, & Rummel‐Kluge, 2020). As Heesacker et al (2020) note, web‐based interventions such as these are showing respectable levels of feasibility and efficacy, although treatment computerization represents an extension of traditional mental health care providers, not a replacement.…”
Section: Telepsychology Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strategies for implementing such interventions for MFCs in military service and other communitybased organizations are discussed elsewhere. 25 Limitations A number of interpretive caveats to this study warrant further consideration. First is the cross-sectional nature of the study; it is unclear whether social support is causally related to DS or HOs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Other studies in this section explore issues using telepsychology with unique groups. The preliminary study of an avatar‐based intervention for military family caregivers suggests this innovative approach may be useful to meet the needs of these individuals (Wilcox, 2020). The paper by Tarlow et al analyzed service utilization behaviors and client distance from an access point where telepsychology services were provided in a “hub and spoke” model of service delivery (Tarlow, McCord, Du, Hammett, & Wills, 2020; Timothy Elliott served as the action editor for this submission).…”
Section: Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%