2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11239-020-02071-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation and impact of a multidisciplinary coagulation factor stewardship program at an academic medical center

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…29 Although use before and after stewardship was similar, there was a total semiannual cost savings of $101,736. 29…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…29 Although use before and after stewardship was similar, there was a total semiannual cost savings of $101,736. 29…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Lastly, Waheed et al in 2020 investigated preand post-protocol changes with the involvement of a hematology consult to guide the appropriate use of off-label 4-factor PPC and rFVIIa. 29 Although use before and after stewardship was similar, there was a total semiannual cost savings of $101,736. 29 There were several limitations to this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several publications have highlighted the impact of Hemostatic and Antithrombotic Stewardship Programs (Table 1). 9‐18 Of the 10 stewardship programs with reported outcomes, four programs had initiatives only focused on anticoagulation stewardship, four programs only focused on hemostatic stewardship, and two programs had a combination of select interventions involving anticoagulation and hemostatic stewardship. Reported anticoagulation interventions primarily involve anticoagulant prescribing and institutional protocol adherence, as well as focused efforts on heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) management to reduce intravenous direct thrombin inhibitor (IV DTI) use 9‐12,17,18 .…”
Section: Existing Hemostatic And/or Antithrombotic Stewardship Progra...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reported anticoagulation interventions primarily involve anticoagulant prescribing and institutional protocol adherence, as well as focused efforts on heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) management to reduce intravenous direct thrombin inhibitor (IV DTI) use 9‐12,17,18 . Other programs aimed at the optimization of CFC use have reported optimization of patient selection for prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) administration for anticoagulation reversal, preferential use of activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) over recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) for hemophilia patients with inhibitors, CFC formulary management, implementation of 340B Drug Pricing Program for CFCs, and continuous infusion CFC administration 13‐16 . Notably, across all programs, pharmacists have been essential to program development and in most cases are heavily involved in direct patient care for patients receiving anticoagulants and CFCs.…”
Section: Existing Hemostatic And/or Antithrombotic Stewardship Progra...mentioning
confidence: 99%