SAE Technical Paper Series 2005
DOI: 10.4271/2005-01-2968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation and Testing of a Mechanical Counterpressure Bio-Suit System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, the interface material can be reinforced along the lines of non-extension or minimum strain to enable maximum motility of the skin while providing targeted support. As an example, following the work by Iberall et al [15], [28], researchers have proposed the use of the lines of non-extension in the design of space suits [29][30] [31] e.g. incorporating local directional adjustment of fabric reinforcement and contractile properties in parallel to natural skin deformation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the interface material can be reinforced along the lines of non-extension or minimum strain to enable maximum motility of the skin while providing targeted support. As an example, following the work by Iberall et al [15], [28], researchers have proposed the use of the lines of non-extension in the design of space suits [29][30] [31] e.g. incorporating local directional adjustment of fabric reinforcement and contractile properties in parallel to natural skin deformation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, scholars have proposed many structural design schemes to improve the joint mobility, for example, using soft joints of spacesuits [4], such as flat pleated joints, corrugated joints, and orange petal joints. The mechanical counter pressure schemes [5,6] and some relevant joint structures have high requirements in terms of materials, and they can only achieve partial pressure protection. The pneumatic joint structures [7] have good joint mobility, but the structures are bloated, resulting in a large deviation from the theoretical isotensive solid surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%