2010
DOI: 10.15685/omnes.2010.05.1.1.67
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation Evaluation on Foreign Brides’ Literacy Education in Taipei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of them also had limited knowledge of Taiwan and came from cultures with patriarchal structures that stressed subservience; these factors made them vulnerable (Yang & Wang, 2011). The literature on the subject (Chung & Wang, 2004; Hsia, 2007; Kuo & Hsu, 2010; Sheu, 2007; Williams & Yu, 2006) details many of the challenges that FMMs face including language barriers, a stressful lifestyle, economic problems, as well as naturalization and citizenship issues (Cheng, 2013; Hsia, 2008). In the same period, the dual exclusion-assimilation scheme initiated by Taiwanese legislation further worsened the situation of FMMs (Cheng, 2013).…”
Section: Rationale and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of them also had limited knowledge of Taiwan and came from cultures with patriarchal structures that stressed subservience; these factors made them vulnerable (Yang & Wang, 2011). The literature on the subject (Chung & Wang, 2004; Hsia, 2007; Kuo & Hsu, 2010; Sheu, 2007; Williams & Yu, 2006) details many of the challenges that FMMs face including language barriers, a stressful lifestyle, economic problems, as well as naturalization and citizenship issues (Cheng, 2013; Hsia, 2008). In the same period, the dual exclusion-assimilation scheme initiated by Taiwanese legislation further worsened the situation of FMMs (Cheng, 2013).…”
Section: Rationale and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These scales were developed based on content validity, and during the development, the vocation high school instructor and experts with abundant experiences discussed the appropriateness and the wording of the questions and then modified the questions before they were finalized. The reliability of each scale is presented below [13]. For the internal consistency of the cognitive learning scale, it has a KR20 coefficient of 0.876.…”
Section: Research Design and Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%