Abstract. The first OH and HO2 radical observation in Yangtze River Delta, one of
the four major urban agglomerations in China, was carried out at a suburban
site (Taizhou) in summer 2018 from May to June, aiming to elucidate the
atmospheric oxidation capacity in this region. The maximum diurnal averaged
OH and HO2 concentrations were 1.0×107 and
1.1×109 cm−3, respectively, which were the second
highest HOx (sum of OH and HO2) radical concentrations observed in
China. HONO photolysis was the dominant radical primary source, accounting
for 42 % of the total radical initiation rate. Other contributions were
from carbonyl photolysis (including HCHO, 24 %), O3 photolysis
(17 %), alkene ozonolysis (14 %), and NO3 oxidation (3 %). A
chemical box model based on the RACM2-LIM1 mechanism could generally reproduce
the observed HOx radicals, but systematic discrepancy remained in the
afternoon for the OH radical, when the NO mixing ratio was less than 0.3 ppb.
An additional recycling mechanism equivalent to 100 ppt NO was capable to fill
the gap. The sum of monoterpenes was on average up to 0.4 ppb during
daytime, which was all allocated to α-pinene in the base model.
A sensitivity test without monoterpene input showed the modeled OH and
HO2 concentrations would increase by 7 % and 4 %, respectively, but
modeled RO2 concentration would significantly decrease by 23 %,
indicating that monoterpene was an important precursor of RO2 radicals
in this study. Consequently, the daily integrated net ozone production would
reduce by 6.3 ppb without monoterpene input, proving the significant role
of monoterpene in the photochemical O3 production in this study.
In addition, the generally good agreement between observed and modeled HOx
concentrations suggested no significant HO2 heterogeneous uptake
process during this campaign. Incorporation of HO2 heterogeneous uptake
process would worsen the agreement between HOx radical observation and
simulation, and the discrepancy would be beyond the combined measurement–model
uncertainties using an effective uptake coefficient of 0.2.
Finally, the ozone production efficiency (OPE) was only 1.7 in this study, a
few folds lower than other studies in (sub)urban environments. The low OPE
indicated a slow radical propagation rate and short chain length. As a
consequence, ozone formation was suppressed by the low NO concentration in
this study.