2019 AEIT International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive (AEIT AUTOMOTIVE) 2019
DOI: 10.23919/eeta.2019.8804497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of a MEC-based Vulnerable Road User Warning System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study shows costs and benefits in terms of battery consumption and processing time when migrating tasks from the smartphones to the edge nodes. Other studies about costs and benefits of migration of an application from the remote cloud to the edge nodes can be found in [13] and [14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study shows costs and benefits in terms of battery consumption and processing time when migrating tasks from the smartphones to the edge nodes. Other studies about costs and benefits of migration of an application from the remote cloud to the edge nodes can be found in [13] and [14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key application for V2I event-driven messages is Vulnerable Road Users (VRUs) warning systems. One approach, explored in [121], [127] and [128], is based on vehicles and VRUs' devices sending CAMs or BSMs to the infrastructure. The infrastructure processes the information in the CAMs/BSMs and detects risks of collisions.…”
Section: V2i Event-driven Messagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a risk of collision is detected, the infrastructure sends warning messages to vehicles and VRUs. In these works the focus was on latency, and the results highlight the importance of processing the CAM information to predict collisions close to the edge of the network: perhaps using MEC in the RSU, if D2D technologies are used [127]; or using MEC in base stations if Uu interfaces are used [121] [128]. The evaluation in [121] and [127] was done with real equipment in a lab environment, and system level simulations were carried out in [128].…”
Section: V2i Event-driven Messagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, Napolitano et al proposed a fully compatible design and implementation of a vulnerable road users (VRU) warning system, as well as an experimental assessment of the system using MEC-and cloud-based architectures. 22 The authors developed a strategy that would enable road users to communicate information regarding the existence of neighbouring entities in the event of a difficult circumstance (e.g., road accident). This is accomplished by using an architecture that consists of a user-facing Android application and a MEC-based application [cooperative awareness messages (CAM)].…”
Section: Applicability Of Ec For V2xmentioning
confidence: 99%