2017
DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2016-001135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of a new health information technology for the management of cancer chemotherapies

Abstract: BackgroundCancer chemotherapy drugs are classified as high-risk molecules. Safety of the cancer chemotherapy process is often achieved with the implementation of a health information technology to each step or to the entire process. However, computerisation could lead to the emergence of new unintended medication errors. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of new software designed for the management of anticancer chemotherapies.MethodThe cartography of the process and the failure modes, effects and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The minimum CI was 1 (i.e., negligible criticality: acceptable risk situations as they are, corresponding to a low risk) and the maximum CI was 25 (i.e., maximum criticality: risky situations that are not acceptable as they are, requiring analysis and corrective measures to reduce the risk to at least one risk to watch). Criticality was classified as minor (1-5), medium (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15) or maximal (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). See Table 1d in Appendix S2 (Supporting Information)…”
Section: The Risk Matrix Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The minimum CI was 1 (i.e., negligible criticality: acceptable risk situations as they are, corresponding to a low risk) and the maximum CI was 25 (i.e., maximum criticality: risky situations that are not acceptable as they are, requiring analysis and corrective measures to reduce the risk to at least one risk to watch). Criticality was classified as minor (1-5), medium (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15) or maximal (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). See Table 1d in Appendix S2 (Supporting Information)…”
Section: The Risk Matrix Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,11,12 These electronic prescription systems, also called computerized provider order entry (CPOE), offer simplified and accelerated treatment management processes, which result in significant patient safety improvement. 13,14 However, new types of medication errors related to both failures and limitations of software have also emerged, adding to potential human and organizational errors. 2,15 The new error types can be programming errors (i.e., an error in the creation of the treatment protocol in the software), selection errors (i.e., selecting the wrong patient or the wrong protocol), software defects and errors related to the user's level of knowledge of the software.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of computerised prescribing systems, such as Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE), has helped to reduce errors by incorporating validated chemotherapy regimens and safety alerts. However, this has also led to new types of errors, requiring further measures 3 4. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) recommends implementing checkpoints throughout the entire process, including pharmaceutical validation 5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies show that the implementation of the CPOE system, a tool for electronic entry medications for drug ordering, especially chemotherapy agent ordering, can essentially prevent or significantly reduce the medication errors at any stage of the medication use process, especially at the prescribing phase (a 44% to 88% reduction in prescribing phase errors). [ 4 13 17 18 19 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%