2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11044-019-09688-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of a non-Hertzian contact model for railway dynamic application

Abstract: Lateral coordinate of the wheel surface xL Length of the strip x,y,z Cartesian coordinates y0 One dimension of the SDEC α Direction of the linear creepage γ Tangent angle of the cross-section γ Right-hand side of the acceleration constraint equations vector δ Penetration magnitude max  Maximum penetration velocity ΔFx Deviation of the longitudinal creep force ΔFy Deviation of the lateral creep force ΔMz Deviation of the spin creep moment Δr Step size for the radial coordinate Δs Width of the strip Δθ Step siz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(172 reference statements)
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach was originally developed by British Railway Research for elliptic contacts and was recently extended to non-Hertzian contact patches [157,158]. Recently, a contact model incorporating both a fast non-Hertzian method to solve the normal problem and a non-Hertzian book of tables has been proposed in [126].…”
Section: Wheel-rail Contact Models In a Multibody Dynamics Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach was originally developed by British Railway Research for elliptic contacts and was recently extended to non-Hertzian contact patches [157,158]. Recently, a contact model incorporating both a fast non-Hertzian method to solve the normal problem and a non-Hertzian book of tables has been proposed in [126].…”
Section: Wheel-rail Contact Models In a Multibody Dynamics Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such studies require the use of advanced computational tools and experiments to validate models and de-risk the development of new technology. This involves using Multi-Body (MB) systems methodologies for railway vehicle dynamics to study different type of problems [2][3][4][5], including virtual homologation [6,7], study of the vehicle performance for selected tracks [8,9], derailments prevention [10][11][12][13][14][15], design of suspensions [16][17][18], tracks with complex geometries [19][20][21][22], traction or braking systems [23,24], pantograph-catenary interaction [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35], just to mention a few.…”
Section: Figure 1: Overview Of Vehicle-track Interaction and Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of railway vehicle dynamics by using multibody systems methodologies has been increasing its popularity in the past years, due to its efficiency and reliability to formulate and solve different type of problems [1][2][3][4], namely virtual homologation of vehicles [5,6], study of the vehicle performance for selected tracks [7,8], derailments prevention [9][10][11][12], design of suspension, traction or braking systems [13][14][15], just to mention a few. One of the major issues concerning the dynamic modelling and simulation of railway vehicles deals with the evaluation of the vehicle-track interaction, which consists of the solution of the contact between the wheels and the rails.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the colliding bodies present simple geometries, the contact detection phase can be a straightforward task and solved analytically. However, in the most general case, where the contacting surfaces have an arbitrary shape, the search for potential contact points might become a demanding and complex task [3,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%